[Ffmpeg-devel-irc] ffmpeg-devel.log.20160824

[burek]

[00:09:48 CEST] <Compn> JEEB : living in japan or somewheres else ?
[00:16:04 CEST] <JEEB> Compn: just moving around .fi. I just got back from a 2-week thing in .jp
[00:16:29 CEST] <TD-Linux> gee I wonder what that could be
[00:59:27 CEST] <Compn> JEEB : do japanese talk about fukushima at all ?
[00:59:38 CEST] <Compn> probably not.
[01:39:54 CEST] <jamrial> durandal_1707: 61980dc seems to have broken gbrap on all filter-pixfmts* tests
[04:13:35 CEST] <michaelni> atomnuker, is "[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/aaccoder: Limit sf_idx difference for all cases" ok ?
[05:55:17 CEST] <durandal_1707> jamrial: probably because its now properly decoded
[06:07:15 CEST] <jamrial> durandal_1707: update the ref file then :p
[07:39:17 CEST] <cone-545> ffmpeg 03Carl Eugen Hoyos 07master:c1de1f046997: lavf/movenc: Add a missing assignment if memory allocation fails.
[08:09:20 CEST] <cone-545> ffmpeg 03Paul B Mahol 07master:35a0bc0d94bc: fate: update for gbrap after 61980dc479ce045d2e280bff0ba2118ccb8ce595
[08:50:54 CEST] <cone-545> ffmpeg 03Paul B Mahol 07master:0edfd8e6f4bb: avfilter/vf_lut: add planar RGB support
[10:08:53 CEST] <atomnuker> michaelni: klaussfreire said he'd look at it later today
[10:10:12 CEST] <michaelni> atomnuker, ok thx
[14:13:06 CEST] <durandal_1707> fine to apply conditional filter?
[14:18:49 CEST] <durandal_1707> also, nobody wants to learn yasm?
[16:04:06 CEST] <durandal_1707> atomnuker: when i libfaac gonna be removed?
[16:04:51 CEST] <atomnuker> I'll have time to write a news entry and a changelog entry tommorrow
[16:09:24 CEST] <cone-545> ffmpeg 03Burt P 07master:0cfe6acbe498: fate: add test for af_hdcd analyze mode
[16:09:25 CEST] <cone-545> ffmpeg 03Burt P 07master:8a78fc5b015f: af_hdcd: check return value of av_frame_copy_props()
[16:14:19 CEST] <bp0> atomnuker, there are some people who might like to keep faac
[16:14:28 CEST] <bp0> in something like ffmpeg
[16:14:38 CEST] <bp0> using it as low anchor in listening tests
[16:15:35 CEST] <j-b> they can use an old version or a standalone tool
[16:15:48 CEST] <j-b> faac is non-free, old and unmaintained. why clutter ffmpeg with it?
[16:17:40 CEST] <bp0> well, there are users
[16:17:50 CEST] <bp0> its ok, I just thought I would mention it
[16:18:55 CEST] <j-b> users want everything :)
[18:35:27 CEST] <durandal_1707> fine to commit yuvtestsrc without review?
[18:35:51 CEST] <JEEB> is it on the ML?
[18:36:02 CEST] <durandal_1707> my patches are generally ignored
[18:36:14 CEST] <durandal_1707> JEEB: nope
[18:36:16 CEST] <JEEB> label:ffmpeg-devel yuvtestsrc 
[18:36:20 CEST] <JEEB> yeah, thought so :P
[18:36:38 CEST] <JEEB> so it generates some sort of test pattern?
[18:37:48 CEST] <durandal_1707> similar as rgbtestsrc
[18:38:46 CEST] <JEEB> huh, wtf
[18:38:53 CEST] <JEEB> there is no rgbtestsrc filter
[18:38:56 CEST] <JEEB> oh
[18:38:59 CEST] <JEEB> vsrc_testsrc
[19:58:57 CEST] <Chloe> durandal_1707: yuvtestsrc looks fine. I would have aligned the variable definitions in yuvtest_fill_picture16, but that's just me, it's not like it's completely unreadable either.
[20:01:06 CEST] <Chloe> (I mean the block of definitions at the top of yuvtest_fill_picture16)
[20:02:35 CEST] <durandal_1707> I missed discussion, bad connection
[20:04:51 CEST] <durandal_1707> Chloe?
[20:06:36 CEST] <jamrial> <Chloe> durandal_1707: yuvtestsrc looks fine. I would have aligned the variable definitions in yuvtest_fill_picture16, but that's just me, it's not like it's completely unreadable either.
[20:38:48 CEST] <Chloe> although, it actually looks fine, I tried to align them, and I couldn't find a way to do it nicely.
[20:39:16 CEST] <durandal_170> what? Code?
[20:40:05 CEST] <Chloe> durandal_170: aligning the variable definitions at the top of yuvtest_fill_picture16 further
[20:40:23 CEST] <Chloe> in the code, not memory alignment
[20:41:20 CEST] <durandal_170> I sort it usually be line length :-)
[20:47:03 CEST] <durandal_170> there are some code align warnings across codebase
[20:51:51 CEST] <Chloe> "my patches are generally ignored", idk about others, but most of your patches are far too complex for me to look at
[20:57:47 CEST] <durandal_170> Chloe: what? Recently I post trivial stuff only
[21:00:07 CEST] <durandal_170> if you need help in explaining anything, just tell
[21:03:14 CEST] <Chloe> durandal_170: what does 'Grow first stream into second stream by connecting components.' mean?
[21:08:56 CEST] <durandal_170> Chloe: it is for thickening masks
[21:10:25 CEST] <durandal_170> it enlarges area in first stream with area in second stream
[21:11:23 CEST] <durandal_170> but only if part of second video area is above/bellow front one
[21:11:56 CEST] <durandal_170> *first
[21:12:31 CEST] <Chloe> and both streams are masks?
[21:19:09 CEST] <Chloe> I guess it doesn't matter since any stream can be used as a mask, thanks though, I think I understand it now.
[00:00:00 CEST] --- Thu Aug 25 2016