[00:00:05 CEST] <j-b> and I'll soon move to doing Javascript and web development [00:00:19 CEST] <Compn> no not javascript [00:00:24 CEST] <JEEB> j-b: sounds like something that will pay the bills [00:00:58 CEST] <j-b> JEEB: Javascript is awesome! [00:01:12 CEST] <JEEB> ecmascript is bearable [00:01:29 CEST] <JEEB> (as there really isn't anything better on the web) [00:02:03 CEST] <JEEB> and there are things like TS (thank you visual studio for registering that extension from my video players) that add the "notice mistakes before you go into production" [00:02:06 CEST] <JEEB> layer [00:02:29 CEST] <j-b> oh yes [00:03:04 CEST] <Compn> JEEB : you could make a new cross-plat browser language to replace javascript which is showing its age [00:03:10 CEST] <Compn> and make a lot of money doing that... [00:03:14 CEST] <Compn> there, another $1m idea. [00:03:26 CEST] <iive> firefox support webassembly or something like that [00:03:27 CEST] <JEEB> nah, I'll rather just watch mobile game footage https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSxrvUsssGE [00:03:30 CEST] <j-b> yep [00:03:34 CEST] <j-b> port Qt to wasm [00:03:36 CEST] <JEEB> yea, webasm is the thing coming [00:03:59 CEST] Action: Compn waiting for a real web browser to come along :( [00:04:41 CEST] <j-b> vivaldi? [00:04:42 CEST] <j-b> brave? [00:05:05 CEST] <Compn> vivaldi just sent me an email [00:05:17 CEST] <Compn> guess i should read how much they really want to change chrome but end up not changing it [00:05:17 CEST] <JEEB> brave seemed fun. also mozilla making the tab containers a freely available add-on instead of a registration-needed experiment [00:06:19 CEST] <Compn> containers lol [00:06:32 CEST] <JEEB> hey, I like the idea [00:06:33 CEST] Action: Compn just has portable browsers in different locations [00:06:40 CEST] <Compn> guess i'm ahead of the currrrrrve [00:06:47 CEST] <JEEB> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account-containers/ [00:07:00 CEST] <JEEB> so you can have tab groups that have 100% separate local storage [00:07:03 CEST] <Compn> right [00:07:12 CEST] <wm4> isn't firefox breaking addons [00:07:14 CEST] <Compn> its called portable browsers in different locations. [00:07:25 CEST] <JEEB> wm4: yes, which is why these are based on the new APIs [00:07:40 CEST] <JEEB> the old API extensions will have a lot of extinction [00:07:41 CEST] <wm4> oh so there is a new API [00:07:44 CEST] <JEEB> after 57 hits [00:08:01 CEST] <JEEB> wm4: and they recommend people who have missing functionality to make experiments which let you draw the interfaces [00:08:17 CEST] <JEEB> so that they can be evaluated and implemented if people feel it's a useful addition to the WE API [00:08:32 CEST] <JEEB> but as I've already noted, the death of the XUL add-ons *will* kill a lot of extensions [00:08:41 CEST] <JEEB> because people were making them for fun [00:08:43 CEST] <Compn> LOL brave inserts its own ads [00:08:50 CEST] <Compn> also based on chromium [00:08:51 CEST] <JEEB> and people don't want to do random rewrites [00:08:59 CEST] <JEEB> yea, everything and their dog has chromium there [00:09:01 CEST] <Compn> how is it faster than chrome if its using chrome ? [00:09:03 CEST] <graphitemaster> I've been using firefox-nightly on Windows and Linux (now uses the new stylo by default and electrosys (their multi threaded browser renderer)), they're working on an interruptible html/css rewrite too to be threaded which is in beta, the performance has been nothing short of amazing. In terms of user experience alone, I'd argue it's 2 to 4 times nicer feeling. [00:09:22 CEST] <JEEB> graphitemaster: yea I'll get on that train as 57 hits beta [00:09:32 CEST] <JEEB> also it will also show me how much I will miss tab groups [00:09:38 CEST] <Compn> multi threaded just means its going to lock up more threads :P [00:09:40 CEST] <JEEB> so I can have my por^Wprivate content in another group [00:09:58 CEST] <Compn> opens browser ... 50 porn tabs start loading [00:09:59 CEST] <Compn> hmmmmmmmmmm [00:10:22 CEST] <JEEB> and that is why you have them in multiple groups ;) [00:10:24 CEST] <wm4> I wonder if slack in firefox will finally be usable [00:10:38 CEST] <graphitemaster> por^Wprivate content is best suited to the por^Wprivate hub app on Android with a VR headset, you don't even need VR content, just being able to lay back and het a nice "large screen TV" feel ;-) [00:10:46 CEST] <JEEB> pfft [00:10:51 CEST] <JEEB> I mostly read that sort of stuff [00:11:02 CEST] <JEEB> so a screen and an easily operable reader is all I need 8) [00:11:04 CEST] <graphitemaster> slack isn't usable in any context. [00:12:36 CEST] <iive> what is that slack you are talking about? [00:13:11 CEST] <graphitemaster> slack is a webapp based chat thing like IRC but with more features, like inline images and emojis and videos, very media rich [00:13:51 CEST] <graphitemaster> also slow as crap since it's a billion lines of javascript apparently that takes 95 hours for your browser to interpret unless you have a JIT [00:14:47 CEST] <Compn> i think the web as we know it is outdated [00:14:51 CEST] <wm4> yes, it's like IRC but worse and with web shit [00:14:59 CEST] <Compn> in the future all websites will just be streamed video with interactive content [00:15:08 CEST] <Compn> thus getting rid of html/javascript 99% [00:15:20 CEST] <Compn> j-b : you going to make this a reality? ^^^ [00:15:24 CEST] <Compn> you can have my idea for $1m [00:15:57 CEST] <Compn> the only thing the client gets is html5 or flash video [00:16:06 CEST] <Compn> website is all server side again :) [00:17:19 CEST] Action: Compn wonders why he gives all of his great ideas away for free [00:18:15 CEST] <iive> Compn: there will actually be only one site. facebook. [00:18:23 CEST] <j-b> very more likely [00:19:41 CEST] <iive> does facebook have its own Alexa like device? [00:21:07 CEST] <Compn> good question [00:21:18 CEST] <Compn> google, apple siri, amazon alexa... [00:21:51 CEST] <Compn> iive : the internet says fb is working on a voice speaker/video chat device [00:22:22 CEST] <j-b> iive: every android device? [00:22:41 CEST] <iive> j-b: android is google [00:22:58 CEST] <j-b> fb is preinstalled in all android devices [00:23:04 CEST] <j-b> with all the permissions set [00:23:33 CEST] <iive> well, Alexa is a tube that you put in your house and that has 8 microphones that work at all time. [00:23:41 CEST] Action: Compn checks and sees that there is no facebook app on his phone [00:23:42 CEST] <Compn> wew [00:23:47 CEST] <iive> phones turn off some stuff to preserve power. [00:24:28 CEST] <Compn> facebook is built into the accounts thing in android [00:24:35 CEST] <Compn> if you add your account there, that is [00:26:07 CEST] <iive> also, Alexa like devices cost about $50, they are basically giving them away for free. [00:31:44 CEST] <Compn> wm4 : whats your plan for ffmpeg future ? [00:34:42 CEST] <wm4> nothing [00:36:08 CEST] <graphitemaster> what's your plan for ffmpeg past? [00:36:49 CEST] <Compn> j-b : what about the proposed plan to destroy the git history and re-make it without the merge commits ? [00:37:00 CEST] <Compn> or to modify git so a checkout does not land on a merge ? [00:37:08 CEST] <Compn> and that merges are silenced ... [00:37:09 CEST] <j-b> Compn: I have that, personnally [00:37:44 CEST] <Compn> j-b : i was under the impression that a lot of devs would want such a repo... if you want to share it with them [00:37:52 CEST] <j-b> no. [00:37:54 CEST] <j-b> pay me. [00:38:01 CEST] <Compn> how much [00:38:04 CEST] <j-b> Compn: 1million [00:39:12 CEST] <wm4> chance missed I guess [00:39:27 CEST] <Compn> wm4 : didnt you want such a repo or no ? [00:39:46 CEST] <j-b> Compn: seriously, now is not the time to discuss all this. [00:39:48 CEST] <wm4> whatever would fix the dumb fork situation [00:39:50 CEST] <Compn> oh ok :P [00:40:02 CEST] <Compn> j-b : have fun at vdd! :) [00:40:36 CEST] <j-b> Compn: we have the money (in the million $ range), we have the capacities, we have the skillz. So the issue is mostly the will. [00:41:15 CEST] <j-b> and now, bed it is. [00:42:09 CEST] <Compn> wm4 : come to vdd and see the fork situation in person , face to face :) [00:43:45 CEST] <wm4> probably not [00:45:59 CEST] <graphitemaster> there's an ffmpeg fork? [00:46:17 CEST] <Compn> there are quite a few ffmpeg forks [00:46:22 CEST] <wm4> for 6 years or so [00:46:35 CEST] <graphitemaster> is it the whole libav vs ffmpeg thing [00:46:42 CEST] <graphitemaster> I thought that was finally over [00:46:45 CEST] <Compn> yes, wm4 wont let it go [00:46:50 CEST] <Compn> :P [00:47:42 CEST] <wm4> graphitemaster: why would you think it's over [00:50:43 CEST] <graphitemaster> because fighting over superficial shit isn't engineering? [00:51:27 CEST] <JEEB> I don't think people fight, both camps are happily camping in their own corner [00:52:48 CEST] <Compn> i've been trying to teach people that forks are natural (see xfree86 xorg or redhat / debian or even freebsd / openbsd ) [00:54:36 CEST] <Compn> and trying to reunite ffmpeg and libav would be like trying to get redhat and debian to merge [00:55:08 CEST] <Compn> or debian/ubuntu if you prefer [00:55:34 CEST] <Compn> but i think everyone hates me now [00:55:40 CEST] <iive> hum... ubuntu is way too similar to debian [00:55:41 CEST] <Compn> and most people have me on /ignore [00:59:17 CEST] <Loriker> compn: :-D [01:01:44 CEST] <wm4> Compn: please stop spewing bullshit [01:01:53 CEST] <wm4> why are you always making things harder than they are [01:02:11 CEST] <Compn> you imply that i have any power or say in the matter, wm4 [01:02:30 CEST] <Compn> but i do not. [01:03:31 CEST] <Compn> these are just my opinions [01:20:22 CEST] <graphitemaster> reuniting ffmpeg and libav would be like trying to get north korea and the united states to stop instigating each other [01:24:50 CEST] <wm4> no it wouldn't [02:23:13 CEST] <rcombs> less "north and south korea" and more "north and south dakota" at this point, I think [02:27:54 CEST] <wm4> on that topic: I bet 1988 nobody thought west/east germany unification would have been possible [03:11:52 CEST] <cone-847> ffmpeg 03Tatsuyuki Ishi 07master:598e41684066: GnuTLS: eat PREMATURE_TERMINATION error [03:11:52 CEST] <cone-847> ffmpeg 03Kaustubh Raste 07master:b5da07d4340a: avcodec/mips: Unrolled loops and expanded functions in avc put mc 10 & 30 msa functions [03:11:52 CEST] <cone-847> ffmpeg 03Kaustubh Raste 07master:bba9c1c6bb17: avcodec/mips: Reduced conditional cases in avc inter lpf msa functions [06:08:18 CEST] <atomnuker> kierank: which train are you getting to paris? [06:13:22 CEST] <kierank> atomnuker: 12:24 [06:14:05 CEST] <atomnuker> I'm on the 9:24 [06:18:02 CEST] <kierank> I might be too sick for disneyland [06:19:15 CEST] <atomnuker> did you go to dirtyburger? [07:55:52 CEST] <kurosu> So, is this an exercise in futility to use movntq/movntdqa in checkasm's randomize buffers stuff ? I don't like the speed aspect of checkasm to be essentially reading from known addresses (thus cached) of very recent data (thus L1 or L2 at worst) [07:56:43 CEST] <kurosu> plus everyone does rnd() and reads 16bits of it: is this being entropy-conscious or cargo-culting? [08:01:26 CEST] <kurosu> can't find an equivalent for ARM, but caches are likely smaller [08:02:15 CEST] <kurosu> hum, scratch the movntq/... stuff, you'd need to do it for every call of the tested functions [09:46:20 CEST] <JEEB> was the result of something like (x > y) safe to put into an int, or is having a !! there preferred? [10:08:16 CEST] <rcombs> JEEB: comparisons return 1 or 0, so that's fine [10:08:48 CEST] <JEEB> ok [10:20:05 CEST] <JEEB> rcombs: you can guess what sort of damage is being done in write_traf/trun >_> [10:20:18 CEST] <JEEB> (and I'm trying to make it as presentable/sane as possible) [10:20:35 CEST] <rcombs> my condolences [10:41:13 CEST] <JEEB> there most likely is a much better way of doing this, but I want to get this to some state at the very least >_> [13:35:06 CEST] <cone-208> ffmpeg 03Vittorio Giovara 07master:6f15f1cdc853: pixdesc: Add API to map color property names to enum values [13:47:47 CEST] <bidiko> hi, I'm using FFmpeg library in my ios project. But I'm getting memory leak error how can i solve this problem ? [13:50:15 CEST] <JEEB> valgrind is your friend [13:50:39 CEST] <JEEB> also make as much of the code run'able outside of iOS so you don't cry when you have to debug your multimedia code, if only possible [13:54:03 CEST] <bidiko> valgrind ? I don't know him or her [13:55:23 CEST] <bidiko> if you want to help maybe you can shut up [13:55:38 CEST] <durandal_1707> bidiko: google for valgrind [13:55:42 CEST] <JEEB> those both were very serious recommendations [13:55:48 CEST] <JEEB> a) valgrind is awesome [13:56:00 CEST] <JEEB> b) the more code you can run on your actual workstation, the better for any debugging [13:56:09 CEST] <JEEB> since you don't have to be running it in your iOS emulator [13:56:17 CEST] <JEEB> esp. since I'm not sure if you can run valgrind within your emulator [13:56:37 CEST] <JEEB> http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/quick-start.html [13:56:44 CEST] <JEEB> for all the spoon-feeding [13:57:10 CEST] <JEEB> also this is not -devel stuff, you're an API user so off to #ffmpeg you go [14:06:42 CEST] <atomnuker> who's arriving today? [14:07:43 CEST] <thardin> JEEB: -fsanitize is pretty cool too. not as thorough as valgrind, but much faster [14:07:56 CEST] <thardin> so not excuse not to run it on say FATE [14:08:03 CEST] <thardin> no* [14:57:24 CEST] <TD-Linux> atomnuker, some of use are chilling in the moz office [16:01:59 CEST] <Gramner_> so where is everyone? I heard something about dinner&drinks at le bloc, but dunno what time [17:12:34 CEST] <cone-762> ffmpeg 03Steven Liu 07master:7e9cdd3f49e5: avformat/hlsenc: fix CID 1418106 [17:12:34 CEST] <cone-762> ffmpeg 03Steven Liu 07master:02bf023afe00: MAINTAINERS: modify the hlsenc description [17:12:34 CEST] <cone-762> ffmpeg 03Steven Liu 07master:c34c0e3a649e: avformat/hlsenc: support http method for hls fmp4 init file [20:58:02 CEST] <atomnuker> kierank / Gramner_ / TD-Linux / anyone here: want to hang out [20:58:34 CEST] <kierank> We are at the place [20:58:39 CEST] <atomnuker> the place? [20:59:01 CEST] <kierank> Le bloc [20:59:38 CEST] <atomnuker> the cafe just next to the hotel? [21:01:22 CEST] <atomnuker> kierank: guess its not that one, where is it? [21:01:47 CEST] <kierank> No [21:01:53 CEST] <kierank> It's 10 mins walk [21:02:38 CEST] <atomnuker> ah, the one next to brochant? [21:03:05 CEST] <atomnuker> k, leaving now, do wait for me [22:59:47 CEST] <durandal_1707> dont get drunk and vomit here [23:09:59 CEST] <jvanriper> Hullo, all. I want to provide a small update to support captioning in DirecTV, but I also want to ensure it fits the code. [23:10:15 CEST] <Compn> sure [23:10:17 CEST] <Compn> whats up jvanriper [23:11:11 CEST] <jvanriper> Currently, ffmpeg supports 'a53_cc', and the ff_alloc_a53_sei function sets up the header accordingly. [23:11:45 CEST] <jvanriper> DirecTV, however, didn't wait for the standard, and went forward with a slightly different header. It's close, but different enough to cause problems for some folks who are trying to send to their receivers. [23:12:16 CEST] <jvanriper> Ergo, I want to provide another function, say, ff_alloc_directv_sei, that would hopefully set the headers according to what their receivers need. [23:12:49 CEST] <jvanriper> So, nice and clean... separate functions... but we need a way to select the appropriate function based on some kind of argument. [23:13:21 CEST] <jvanriper> I noticed that you have an a53cc argument that sets this up. It uses OFFSET(a53_cc), etc. [23:14:12 CEST] <jvanriper> But, it's expected to be a BOOL, where for my needs an INT might be better... when set to 0, it's disabled, 1 for a53_cc, 2 for directv_cc. [23:15:17 CEST] <jvanriper> So, perhaps a directvcc argument would be set, which would lead to this (currently) a53_cc being set to 2. But a53cc would set a53_cc to 1. [23:15:41 CEST] <jvanriper> I'd need to ensure all the functions currently relying upon these settings work appropriately, of course. [23:16:13 CEST] <jvanriper> (and, unfortunately, I haven't considered yet *reading* this instead of *encoding* it, as my focus has been more on encoding it). [23:16:50 CEST] <jvanriper> Anyway, I don't want to move forward with an idea like this, if it doesn't quite fit in with things. Or if someone might have a better approach that fits the project better (I'm certainly not familiar with it). [23:17:04 CEST] <Compn> sure , someone should have a better idea [23:17:08 CEST] <Compn> i'm not familiar with that part of the code [23:17:14 CEST] <Compn> maybe ask ubitux ? [23:17:42 CEST] <jvanriper> Okay. Might I find him/her through email? [23:17:57 CEST] <jvanriper> (or perhaps just go through the e-mail list?) [23:18:02 CEST] <Compn> yes [23:18:10 CEST] <jvanriper> Okay. [23:18:22 CEST] <Compn> sure asking on ffmpeg-devel would also be good [23:18:32 CEST] <Compn> or you can wait around here if you want [23:18:36 CEST] Action: Compn going afk [23:18:42 CEST] <jvanriper> kk. Just thought I should check here first, just in case. kk. [23:18:47 CEST] <Compn> no problemo [23:18:51 CEST] <Compn> feel free to ask questions [23:18:57 CEST] <Compn> i think people just arent on irc right now [23:19:02 CEST] <jvanriper> Alrighty. Take care, then, and thanks. [23:28:26 CEST] <J_Darnley> yeah, people are out drinking too much at VDD [23:29:28 CEST] <llogan> isn't that the norm? [23:31:05 CEST] <llogan> does libfdk_aac support aac_eld profile? https://pastebin.com/raw/02JkC5xu [23:33:40 CEST] <Compn> euhhhhhhhhhh [23:33:42 CEST] <Compn> dont know [23:33:49 CEST] <Compn> aacdec has that nice list of supported things [23:33:56 CEST] <Compn> wonder if fdk has it too [23:34:30 CEST] <llogan> it should...if the docs are correct [23:40:01 CEST] <Compn> oh [23:40:14 CEST] <Compn> is our profile correctly sending to libfdk [23:40:15 CEST] <Compn> ? [23:41:03 CEST] <Compn> e.g. does -profile work with libfdk and ... is it correct profile name... [00:00:00 CEST] --- Fri Sep 22 2017
participants (1)
-
burek