On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 7:39 PM Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 2:53 PM Vittorio Giovara < vittorio.giovara@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 2:02 PM Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:59 PM Vittorio Giovara < vittorio.giovara@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:09 PM Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 9:09 AM Vittorio Giovara < vittorio.giovara@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:55 AM Paul B Mahol <onemda@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 8:53 AM Vittorio Giovara < > vittorio.giovara@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 3:01 AM Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel < > > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > > > > Reposting my question/comment here since Thilo hasn't had a chance to > > > > respond, but shouldn't these kinds of requests go through the GA? If > > > > anybody can do whatever they want with the ffmpeg name, then what's > the > > > > point of voting and following the established process? > > > > > > Probably? I'm not actually sure what the process is for getting an > FFmpeg > > > booth at a conference. Is there a documented process somewhere for how > > this > > > should be done? If not this might be a good opportunity to create one. > > > > > > > Agreed, do you have a draft you could share as a base of discussion? Once > > defined, we could have the GA vote on it > > > > > > > It might also make for a good topic of discussion at VDD. For how much > > > drama there was about NAB on the list I was surprised there was zero > > > discussion about it at FOSDEM. > > > > > > > There were probably more important topics to discuss and the lingering > hope > > that the problematic points would have been handled better than by > calling > > people trolls > > > > > > > Regarding the "or you" part, I wasn't involved in securing sponsorship > > for > > > NAB or IBC. I did volunteer to help with NAB because I happen to live > in > > > Vegas and I enjoy spending time with other ffmpeg developers. I'm happy > > to > > > help at NAB next year as well should it happen again. > > > > > > > Noted, it should have said "or anybody willing to host/help a booth" > > > > I have no plans to attend IBC and no involvement with the FFmpeg booth at > > > IBC. I am merely trying to correct the perception that NAB was > > > cost-problematic, since no money was paid by the project for NAB. > > > > > > > I don't think anybody is suggesting that booths are cost-problematic, but > > rather they are lacking in process (one shouldn't allowed use ffmpeg name > > "just because") and in scope (aka "the why" and what kind of results are > > expected by investing time in said booth) > > > > Said by prominent LibAV developer. >
reported to CC :)
CC is fully controlled by prominent LibAV developers.
Not only is this factually incorrect, it's also unrelated to the topic at hand. No worries, this infringement is being reported to the CC as well, but please try to make an effort at doing better at least. Thank you
Do not trust LibAV developers even when they are giving you gifts.
I'm not giving you anything, please can you stop? I don't want to flood the CC with emails, but I'll do so if that helps stifle this kind of behavior. Please disconnect, grow up, be nicer to your fellow community members, and just do better.
Thank you for your arrogant continuous behavior that match nicely with your latest code contributions.
I don't think I'm being arrogant when I ask you to stop abusive behavior. Imagine if people responded with "Typical librempeg developer answer" to all of your email, how would you feel about it?
If you stop responding with mails on all FFmpeg mailing lists from now to indefinite time in future nothing of value would be lost.
Please reread what you wrote and appreciate the irony of the situation. Needless to say, this is also going straight to CC :) Please just do better, I believe in you! -- Vittorio