On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:34:04AM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On 4/19/19, Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> wrote:
Paul B Mahol (12019-04-19):
This is not about sample rate negotiation.
Yes it is.
Give proof.
No, you need to argue better your pathetic behavior.
Bad argumentation.
Then argue better.
Patches rejected for now.
Look, you are full of shit. And know nothing about audio processing.
As i have been asked to look into this (and as we dont have many other ML admins currently) This is a technical mailing list, arguing about how much you love each other does not belong here. As a remainder Everyone, the subject of discussions should be FFmpeg and the technologies sorounding it. Insults, "Ad hominem" argumentation/attacks, and so on lead to a hostile climate that helps noone not even the one winning the argument eventually. If theres a disagreement on a patch (one wanting it in one not wanting it in and after technical discussion its not resolved), we can if everything else fails do a vote on the patch. A technical solution with technical arguments is better though than a vote. Thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. -- George Orwell