On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 08:24:57PM +0200, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 5:47 PM Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel < ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
On Jun 3, 2024, at 11:53 PM, Vittorio Giovara < vittorio.giovara@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 3:01 AM Cosmin Stejerean via ffmpeg-devel < ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote:
Reposting my question/comment here since Thilo hasn't had a chance to respond, but shouldn't these kinds of requests go through the GA? If anybody can do whatever they want with the ffmpeg name, then what's the point of voting and following the established process?
Probably? I'm not actually sure what the process is for getting an FFmpeg booth at a conference. Is there a documented process somewhere for how this should be done? If not this might be a good opportunity to create one.
Agreed, do you have a draft you could share as a base of discussion? Once defined, we could have the GA vote on it
If you really want to work on a proposal I'm happy to collaborate with you offline to draft something and then propose it to the GA.
Sure I'm happy to work on this with you! Let's talk offline about it
Why should discussions about a FFmpeg booth be offline ? thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness. -- Aristotle