[PATCH] iff: check for pbm tag
more robust
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:26:26AM +0100, ami_stuff wrote:
more robust
iff.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) 717c946586c1ffe223f1c15c63814f2dd8c99a24 __UTF-8_Q_iff_5Fpbmcheck.diff__
LGTM peter, ok if i commit it ? [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Into a blind darkness they enter who follow after the Ignorance, they as if into a greater darkness enter who devote themselves to the Knowledge alone. -- Isha Upanishad
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 07:02:39PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:26:26AM +0100, ami_stuff wrote:
more robust
iff.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) 717c946586c1ffe223f1c15c63814f2dd8c99a24 __UTF-8_Q_iff_5Fpbmcheck.diff__
LGTM peter, ok if i commit it ?
applied [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If a bugfix only changes things apparently unrelated to the bug with no further explanation, that is a good sign that the bugfix is wrong.
On 3/12/12, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@gmx.at> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 07:02:39PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 03:26:26AM +0100, ami_stuff wrote:
more robust
iff.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) 717c946586c1ffe223f1c15c63814f2dd8c99a24 __UTF-8_Q_iff_5Fpbmcheck.diff__
LGTM peter, ok if i commit it ?
applied
Please use --author correctly. Git is smart enough so it will get name from email.
Paul B Mahol <onemda <at> gmail.com> writes:
Please use --author correctly.
It is used correctly for 86b6e4, don't you agree?
No. Compare that one with af55a9.
Notice a difference?
Yes, one uses the name that the author has chosen, one a name chosen by the committer (in case the patch is copyrightable, this is a clear copyright violation where I live). Carl Eugen
Carl Eugen Hoyos <cehoyos <at> ag.or.at> writes:
No. Compare that one with af55a9.
Notice a difference?
Yes, one uses the name that the author has chosen,
one a name chosen by the committer (in case the patch is copyrightable, this is a clear copyright violation where I live).
I meant d3a5c2, sorry about the confusion! Carl Eugen
participants (4)
-
ami_stuff -
Carl Eugen Hoyos -
Michael Niedermayer -
Paul B Mahol