#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by winlin): @JEEB I'm sorry, I wanna apologize for my rude, it's a wrong way to communicate. Would you please offer some example for HLS/DASH to get low latency by decrease the segment and buffer time? Because I have tested the HLS, and I used very smaller segments(<1s), but the latency is still very large. @heleppkes This issue is not about the latency of FLV/RTMP, but it's the key point that why many users use RTMP/FLV. For some interactive live streaming, the protocol is very important, especially there's a CDN between encoder and player. So for H.265, it's also important to support RTMP/FLV in this situation. Sure, I think you're right, I should push Adobe to upgrade the RTMP/FLV for H.265, IT IS the right way(But it's impossible for me to push Adobe, what do you think about it?). So, even if FFMPEG decided to reject this issue, I think it's reasonable. It just upset some users who are making businesses in 1-3s interactive live streaming, which is an interesting and useful tech. FFMPEG, the GOD of live streaming industry, please help us~ -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:25> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker