#6389(avformat:new): Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP ----------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Reporter: winlin | Type: task Status: new | Priority: normal Component: avformat | Version: unspecified Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | ----------------------------------+--------------------------------------- FFMPEG is a great project, thank everyone's awesome work! Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP is the defacto protocol for live streaming over internet and almost all encoders support pushing stream to server or CDN over RTMP protocol, while player like Adobe Flash or Android ExoPlayer or FFMPEG also support HTTP-FLV. Although H.265 is supported by HLS and TS, we can also delivery H.265 over HTTP-TS for realtime live streaming service, but CDNs are more friendly to RTMP/HTTP-FLV. For example, all, that's all, not some, all live streaming service in China now are using RTMP/HTTP-FLV for 3-5s latency, none of them chooses HLS for its large latency. Maybe realtime live streaming is not popular in the US, but I think it's only because the CDN is not very good at delivery RTMP/HTTP-FLV. I know some friends in the UK and US are now build the realtime CDN themselves, some use [NGINX-RTMP](https://github.com/arut/nginx-rtmp-module) like facebook, others using [SRS](https://github.com/ossrs/srs) to delivery realtime live streaming: {{{ Encoder ====RTMP====> SRS(Cluster) ====RTMP/HTTP-FLV====> Player }}} Now, it work very good for H.264+AAC over RTMP/HTTP-FLV for 3-5s realtime live streaming service, what about H.265? Is there any plan to support H.265 over HTTP-FLV/RTMP? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by JEEB): HEVC over FLV (and thus RTMP) is not defined nor supported. And unless Adobe specifies it, we should not support it. We have enough hacks inside FFmpeg as it is. Not to mention that there are alternatives out there are properly specified for newer formats such as VP9 or HEVC that can be utilized instead for both ingest to a media server as well as something the actual playback clients get. I mean, even plain MPEG-TS or fragmented ISOBMFF over HTTP would be achievable easily. And while things like HLS or MPEG- DASH are usually used with relatively high latency (often in order to improve compression ratios), they can also be used so that the latency would be within those parameters you mention, so that sort of latency limitation is not really a limitation per se (considering the ingest to a media server that handles the packaging is done in a relatively sane way and that the encoder in the very beginning of the chain is configured accordingly latency-wise). -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:1> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by winlin): Unfortunately, HLS/DASH doesn't work in 3-5s low latency live streaming service. That's why facebook migrate from HLS to RTMP and that's why none use HLS/DASH in China where the low latency live streaming services are very hot. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:2> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by JEEB): HLS IIRC requires the client to buffer three segments. Make those segments short enough and bam! You have a lower latency. MPEG-DASH has its own limitations and ways of improving latency. So within your idea of "low" latency those are a-OK for the end user. That said, please for the love of god actually read my post which presents multiple alternatives to an Adobe-specific format/protocol which most likely will not get extended any more by Adobe. I know there's a lot of tech already built around RTMP as ingest but as you can clearly see that is going to be a problem if you want to utilize it for anything that was created since. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:3> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by winlin): Neither HLS nor DASH can get 1-3s latency.I don't want to waste time to arguewith you. Show me the solution ifDASH can make it. Please stop talking. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:4> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by winlin): I think you just a "thinker", you think when you make segments of HLS short enough, you can get a low latency? You think DASH is new, DASH is better, so DASH is everything? Show me the demo, OK? Stop cheating yourself please. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:5> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by winlin): For HTTP-FLV/RTMP, the benchmark is [here](https://github.com/ossrs/srs/wiki/v2_EN_LowLatency#benchmark-1). I don't want to talk with you util you can give me a example or demo or even a picture. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:6> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by heleppkes): It makes no difference what you believe, but we're not going to support "custom" extensions of the FLV format - its not our format to extend. If you want to convince someone, then convince Adobe to extend the FLV specification to include HEVC. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:7> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by winlin): @heleppkes 1. If, if Adobe is dead, I means if Adobe is dead or Apple is dead, do you means FFMPEG will never support RTMP/FLV/HLS? Only DASH? What about the user of FFMPEG? Are you really care about your user? Or just care about Adobe or Apple?Isn't FFMPEG live for user? Doesn't FFMPEG care about the user? 2. It's not something `believe`, ok? H.265 over TS/HLS is ok for 10s+ live user, but for 1-3s user there are no choices except RTMP/HTTP-FLV. It's not something `I believe`, it's the fact, can't you see it? I have show you the link about latency of RTMP/HTTP-FLV, can't you show a link of HLS/DASH latency? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:8> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by jiegokoji): it would be great if ffmpeg will support it. Also low latency efficient streaming it the way to 4k ) -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:9> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by canalshare): i think it is very intresting if ffmpeg could support the h265 on flv in order be able to play h265 stream on rtmp format . -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:10> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by seven): +1 It's great for FFMEPG to support 265+FLV/RTMP. I support it. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:11> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by flhcd): +1 It's great for FFMEPG to support 265+FLV/RTMP. I support it. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:12> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by torylinux): +1 It's great for FFMEPG to support 265+FLV/RTMP. I support it. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:13> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by coolfat): +1 It's great for FFMEPG to support 265+FLV/RTMP. I support it. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:14> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by lazyc): +1 It's great for FFMEPG to support 265+FLV/RTMP. I support it. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:15> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by leif): H.265 is better -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:16> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by icamera66): +1 It's great for FFMEPG to support 265+FLV/RTMP. I support it. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:17> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by qingkouwei): +1 It's great for FFMEPG to support 265+FLV/RTMP. I support it. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:18> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by Johnny): +1 It's great for FFMEPG to support 265+FLV/RTMP. I support it. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:19> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by antbao): +1 It's great for FFMEPG to support 265+FLV/RTMP. I support it. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:20> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by begeekmyfriend): I think it is not only business of Adobe but also the industry of live stream including Facebook, Periscope, Musical.ly and so on. RTMP is the defacto protocol supported by CDN. FLV is the defacto container for live stream. And H.264 is the current (while H.265 would be the future) defacto codec format for almost all of the devices including prevailing ARM codec chips. So I strongly support H.265 over FLV into the trunk. FFmpeg should keep track with the need of industry. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:21> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by xym808): ++ great+1 It's great for FFMEPG to support 265+FLV/RTMP. I support it. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:22> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by liuguodong): It will be interesting if ffmpeg support 265+flv/rtmp.flv/rtmp is the defacto protocol/container supported by CDN,h264 is default video codec now in the industry of live stream,but the future will be h265,so i support h265 over flv or rtmp into the trunk. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:23> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by gavin): ffmpeg support 265+flv/rtmp?I'm looking forward to this -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:24> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by winlin): @JEEB I'm sorry, I wanna apologize for my rude, it's a wrong way to communicate. Would you please offer some example for HLS/DASH to get low latency by decrease the segment and buffer time? Because I have tested the HLS, and I used very smaller segments(<1s), but the latency is still very large. @heleppkes This issue is not about the latency of FLV/RTMP, but it's the key point that why many users use RTMP/FLV. For some interactive live streaming, the protocol is very important, especially there's a CDN between encoder and player. So for H.265, it's also important to support RTMP/FLV in this situation. Sure, I think you're right, I should push Adobe to upgrade the RTMP/FLV for H.265, IT IS the right way(But it's impossible for me to push Adobe, what do you think about it?). So, even if FFMPEG decided to reject this issue, I think it's reasonable. It just upset some users who are making businesses in 1-3s interactive live streaming, which is an interesting and useful tech. FFMPEG, the GOD of live streaming industry, please help us~ -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:25> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by gjdfgh): Streaming H265 over FLV is entirely worthless. A bunch of fake votes won't make us waste our time for you. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:26> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by winlin): @gjdfgh So do you means all these votes are fake? What about these "FAKE" votes to ask Adobe to support H.265 in FlashPlayer: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1340207 https://tracker.adobe.com/#/view/FP-3650828 What will happen if it's not JUST mine requirement? How can you see that? If there is no one to vote, you will say "it's just a issue of you". If there are some votes, you will say "they are fake votes"? It's not fair. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:27> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: closed Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: invalid Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Changes (by llogan): * status: new => closed * resolution: => invalid Comment: All of these fake comments from the sockpuppet accounts certainly do not help. Closing as per comments: [comment:1 JEEB]:
HEVC over FLV (and thus RTMP) is not defined nor supported. And unless Adobe specifies it, we should not support it. We have enough hacks inside FFmpeg as it is.
[comment:7 heleppkes]:
It makes no difference what you believe, but we're not going to support "custom" extensions of the FLV format - its not our format to extend.
If you want to convince someone, then convince Adobe to extend the FLV specification to include HEVC.
-- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:28> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: closed Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: invalid Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by winlin): You can close it, but you can never change the truth. There is no sockpuppet accounts, none of them is FAKE. It's not fair. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:29> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: closed Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: invalid Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by gjdfgh):
There is no sockpuppet accounts, none of them is FAKE.
And my grandma is Hillary Clinton. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:30> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: closed Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: invalid Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by winlin): @gjdfgh I believe in you, please show me a evidence or even a picture? We should never take responsibility of what we said, right? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:31> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: closed Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: invalid Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by winlin): I linked this issue to [SRS #465](https://github.com/ossrs/srs/issues/465#issuecomment-301959445), a issue which was filed in almost 2 years ago. Similar to yesterday, I share similar message to the users of SRS and I encourage them to vote if their businesses require this feature. I don't think this is cheating and all these votes are from sockpuppet accounts, right? I think it's very important to get response from user. Maybe some Chinese users don't know how to express in English, they just repeat what others said to vote, but they are not my sockpuppet accounts and their business really need this feature. I agree with the "RIGHT" way to fix this issue, to wait for Adobe to upgrade the RTMP/FLV, I'll try it. There's no streaming protocol support H.265, so media server or CDN is possible to support it. Will this feature be reopen? Or closed for ever? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:32> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: Type: task | Status: closed Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: invalid Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Comment (by heleppkes): Its closed forever. It doesn't matter how many people vote for it, unless Adobe does something. The FLV format specification does not support H.265, and even more so it doesn't use a flexible FourCC system or any other extensible system to support arbitrary codec ids, which means without an official specification for H.265, you basically create unreadable files. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:33> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
#6389: Support H.265 over Adobe HTTP-FLV or RTMP -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: winlin | Owner: (none) Type: task | Status: closed Priority: normal | Component: avformat Version: unspecified | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 0 Analyzed by developer: 0 | -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Changes (by Steven Liu): * resolution: invalid => fixed Comment: supported by commit b76053d8bf322b197a9d07bd27bbdad14fd5bc15 -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/6389#comment:34> FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org> FFmpeg issue tracker
participants (1)
-
FFmpeg