Hello, on Monday I send a little patch for the *vf_blackdetect.c* filter to the dev list, but I don't got any response. I don't wanted to sound impatient, I just want to know that I did everything right. One thing is to, that my patch is not shown here: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/ so I though maybe I did something wrong. For generating the patch I use *git format-patch, *send-mail is not working on my computer, so I send the patch as an attachment. I send the patch from gmail, is this a problem? Is there something specific, I need to know about sending the patch per mail? (yes I read the page step 6: Submitting patches). This was the Mail: http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-December/221698.html Regards Jonathan
On 12/7/2017 1:38 PM, Jon bae wrote:
One thing is to, that my patch is not shown here: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/ so I though maybe I did something wrong.
Patches sent via Gmail web show up as attachments* and don't get listed at Patchwork. Doesn't happen if sent through a client like Thunderbird. Wait for three days after submission and ping if there's no progress. Keep all further correspondence in the same thread on ffmpeg-devel. Regards, Gyan *there may be a way to alter this behaviour but I haven't looked into it. Possibly to do with formatting emails as plaintext.
2017-12-07 9:41 GMT+01:00 Gyan Doshi <gyandoshi@gmail.com>:
On 12/7/2017 1:38 PM, Jon bae wrote:
One thing is to, that my patch is not shown here: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/ so I though maybe I did something wrong.
Patches sent via Gmail web show up as attachments* and don't get listed at Patchwork. Doesn't happen if sent through a client like Thunderbird.
Wait for three days after submission and ping if there's no progress. Keep all further correspondence in the same thread on ffmpeg-devel.
Regards, Gyan
*there may be a way to alter this behaviour but I haven't looked into it. Possibly to do with formatting emails as plaintext.
Thank you Gyan! Then I will wait a bit longer and next time I don't use the Gmail Webmailer anymore. Have a nice day! Jonathan
On 2017-12-07 00:08, Jon bae wrote:
Hello,
on Monday I send a little patch for the *vf_blackdetect.c* filter to the dev list, but I don't got any response. I don't wanted to sound impatient, I just want to know that I did everything right.
One thing is to, that my patch is not shown here: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/ so I though maybe I did something wrong.
For generating the patch I use *git format-patch, *send-mail is not working on my computer, so I send the patch as an attachment.
I send the patch from gmail, is this a problem?
Is there something specific, I need to know about sending the patch per mail? (yes I read the page step 6: Submitting patches).
This was the Mail: http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-December/221698.html
Jonathon: Welcome to ffmpeg! Thank you for taking the time to create a patch and help make the software better. You are asking this question on the ffmpeg-user list, but patches are handled on the ffmpeg-devel list. Are you subscribed to ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org? That is recommended; see <http://ffmpeg.org/developer.html#Documentation_002fOther>, heading about "ffmpeg-devel". If you are subscribed to the list, you can be sure that your patch came through intact. You might get better answers on the ffmpeg-devel list, because it is about patches. ffmpeg-user is about using ffmpeg, which is a different topic. I see three messages from you about "Patch vf_blackdetect" to ffmpeg-devel: [1] <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-December/221689.html> "Here's a patch" [2] <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-December/221698.html> "Here's a patch which works" [3] <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-December/221691.html> "Please forget the last patch" I can imagine someone reading these three messages and thinking, this patch isn't ready. When you have a new patch, it's good to include "v2" (or "v3", "v4", as necessary) in the patch summary to indicate version 2, 3, 4 of the patch. Also, use the --in-reply-to option of git format-patch to specify the Message-Id of the message with the previous version of the patch. This makes your new patch a child of the previous patch in the list message thread. You did that with [2], so maybe you know about this option. Just to check: did you recompile ffmpeg with your patch? Did you run all the FATE tests? Is there already a test in FATE for the change you made? If not, consider adding a FATE test. It will prove your change works. I hope this is helpful. Good luck with the patch, —Jim DeLaHunt -- --Jim DeLaHunt, jdlh@jdlh.com http://blog.jdlh.com/ (http://jdlh.com/) multilingual websites consultant 355-1027 Davie St, Vancouver BC V6E 4L2, Canada Canada mobile +1-604-376-8953
2017-12-07 10:03 GMT+01:00 Jim DeLaHunt <from.ffmpeg-user@jdlh.com>:
On 2017-12-07 00:08, Jon bae wrote:
Hello,
on Monday I send a little patch for the *vf_blackdetect.c* filter to the dev list, but I don't got any response. I don't wanted to sound impatient, I just want to know that I did everything right.
One thing is to, that my patch is not shown here: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/ so I though maybe I did something wrong.
For generating the patch I use *git format-patch, *send-mail is not working on my computer, so I send the patch as an attachment.
I send the patch from gmail, is this a problem?
Is there something specific, I need to know about sending the patch per mail? (yes I read the page step 6: Submitting patches).
This was the Mail: http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-December/221698.html
Jonathon:
Welcome to ffmpeg! Thank you for taking the time to create a patch and help make the software better.
You are asking this question on the ffmpeg-user list, but patches are handled on the ffmpeg-devel list. Are you subscribed to ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org? That is recommended; see < http://ffmpeg.org/developer.html#Documentation_002fOther>, heading about "ffmpeg-devel". If you are subscribed to the list, you can be sure that your patch came through intact.
You might get better answers on the ffmpeg-devel list, because it is about patches. ffmpeg-user is about using ffmpeg, which is a different topic.
Hello Jim, thanks for your replay! I had the intension that people on den devel list a very busy and I don't wanted to budder them with this question, but next time I will write directly to it.
I see three messages from you about "Patch vf_blackdetect" to ffmpeg-devel: [1] <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-December/221689.html> "Here's a patch" [2] <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-December/221698.html> "Here's a patch which works" [3] <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2017-December/221691.html> "Please forget the last patch"
I can imagine someone reading these three messages and thinking, this patch isn't ready.
Yes your are right, this is not optimal. [3] belongs to [1]. I don't now the option "--in-reply-to", I think git have automatically add it.
When you have a new patch, it's good to include "v2" (or "v3", "v4", as necessary) in the patch summary to indicate version 2, 3, 4 of the patch.
Also, use the --in-reply-to option of git format-patch to specify the Message-Id of the message with the previous version of the patch. This makes your new patch a child of the previous patch in the list message thread. You did that with [2], so maybe you know about this option.
Just to check: did you recompile ffmpeg with your patch? Did you run all the FATE tests?
Yes I recompile ffmpeg on OSX and Windows and both works. I try a fate test on Windows, but it has not work, it hangs on a other file, not on my one. I will try it again on OSX, but I think the change is so little, that it have no impact.
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017, at 11:08 PM, Jon bae wrote:
Hello,
on Monday I send a little patch for the *vf_blackdetect.c* filter to the dev list, but I don't got any response. I don't wanted to sound impatient, I just want to know that I did everything right.
My only suggestion is to use a more descriptive subject next time (just copy it from your patch). ffmpeg-devel has a good amount of incoming patches and it's not uncommon for developers to forget or miss submissions. As Gyan mentioned consider replying to your message with "ping" as a reminder on occassion. The author of blackdetect is no longer active so it is up to others to step in and decide to review.
For generating the patch I use *git format-patch, *send-mail is not working on my computer, so I send the patch as an attachment.
Using "git format-patch" and attaching is just fine. We know that not everyone is able or willing to setup "git send-email" (and it took me some time to get off of my ass and do so).
2017-12-07 9:08 GMT+01:00 Jon bae <jonbae77@gmail.com>:
on Monday I send a little patch for the *vf_blackdetect.c* filter to the dev list, but I don't got any response. I don't wanted to sound impatient, I just want to know that I did everything right.
One thing is to, that my patch is not shown here: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/list/ so I though maybe I did something wrong.
For generating the patch I use *git format-patch, *send-mail is not working on my computer, so I send the patch as an attachment.
I send the patch from gmail, is this a problem?
This is what I do regularly, I don't think it should be an issue. Maybe patchwork expects your subject to start with "[PATCH]" to indicate a patch. Carl Eugen
participants (5)
-
Carl Eugen Hoyos -
Gyan Doshi -
Jim DeLaHunt -
Jon bae -
Lou Logan