[Ffmpeg-cvslog] r6213 - in trunk: Changelog MAINTAINERS doc/ffmpeg-doc.texi libavcodec/Makefile libavcodec/allcodecs.c libavcodec/avcodec.h libavcodec/vp5.c libavcodec/vp56.c libavcodec/vp56.h libavcodec/vp56data.c libavcodec/vp56data.h libavcodec/vp5data.h libavcodec/vp6.c libavcodec/vp6data.h libavformat/flvdec.c libavformat/nsvdec.c libavformat/riff.c libavformat/swf.c

[Måns Rullgård]

Baptiste Coudurier <baptiste.coudurier at smartjog.com> writes:

> Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>    
>>>>>
>>>> Is defining a new codec id the only way to identify VP6 in flash ? It
>>>> seems it uses the same function to decode. Why not using CODEC_ID_VP6 ?
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>> The there is a horizontally flipped relation between them. And there
>>> isn't a clean way of joining them to one codec id so the simplest
>>> solution is to use 2 id's.
>>>
>>> MvH
>>> Benjamin Larsson
>>>
>> 
>> Humm, it seems this issue has been discussed already. What was decided ?
>> I can't get if it was decided to use a new codec id or not.
>> 
>> Personnaly I don't like that VP6F codec id. I would be more in favor of
>> setting a field or sub id or a flag in avctx, or maybe put those 2 bytes
>> from the flv in extradata or something to identify it.
>> 
>> What do you guys think ?
>> 
>
> Nobody cares ? Oh well...

I do.  If it is the same codec, it should use the same ID.  What was
the difference again?

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mru at inprovide.com