[FFmpeg-cvslog] r18342 - trunk/doc/APIchanges

[Stefano Sabatini]

On date Tuesday 2009-04-07 01:14:55 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:44:32PM +0200, stefano wrote:
[...]
> > +  This change breaks API/ABI backward compatibility.
> 
> Would it be listed here otherwise? :)

I think it is useful, since not *all* the API changes breaks API/ABI
compatibility, this happen usually only for major bumps and the
immediately following API changes.

But I agree that we should mark *all* such changes (for example also
lavu 50.0.0 and lavu 50.0.1) or no-one.

So what's the preferred way?

Regards.