[FFmpeg-cvslog] r17316 - trunk/libavformat/avformat.h

[Stefano Sabatini]

On date Sunday 2009-02-15 17:52:20 +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:10:17PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:07:32PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:04:09AM +0100, stefano wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Log:
> > > > Document av_iformat_next() and av_oformat_next() functions.
> > > > 
> > > > --- trunk/libavformat/avformat.h	Sun Feb 15 10:03:47 2009	(r17315)
> > > > +++ trunk/libavformat/avformat.h	Sun Feb 15 10:04:08 2009	(r17316)
> > > > @@ -687,7 +687,18 @@ extern AVInputFormat *first_iformat;
> > > >  
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * If f is NULL, returns the first registered input format,
> > > > + * if f is non-NULL, returns the registered input format next after f,
> > > > + * or NULL if f is the last one.
> > > 
> > > I think "next after" is ungrammatical, IIRC my suggestion was
> > > "the next registered input format after f".

I found many results with Google of "next after" used as a sort of
preposition, but yes I agree the form:
the next thing after X
sounds nicer than:
the thing next after X

I'd like to hear the opinion of a native speaker.

[...]

Regards.