[FFmpeg-cvslog] r18096 - trunk/tests/seek.regression.ref

Baptiste Coudurier baptiste.coudurier
Sat Mar 21 08:14:39 CET 2009


Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:54:18PM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
>> Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:03:12AM +0100, bcoudurier wrote:
>>>> Author: bcoudurier
>>>> Date: Sat Mar 21 06:03:11 2009
>>>> New Revision: 18096
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>> update seek regression ref due to 18063
>>> A bit of an explanation for these would be good, it is not obvious why
>>> r18063 should change them, and e.g.
>>>
>>>> @@ -2840,9 +2840,9 @@ ret: 0 st: 0 dts:0.000000 pts:0.000000 p
>>>>  tests/data/b-libav.ffm
>>>>  ret: 0 st: 0 dts:-0.040000 pts:0.000000 pos:8192 size:24795 flags:1
>>>>  ret: 0 st:-1 ts:-1.000000 flags:0
>>>> -ret: 0 st: 1 dts:0.940408 pts:0.940408 pos:380928 size:209 flags:1
>>>> +ret: 0 st: 0 dts:-0.040000 pts:0.000000 pos:8192 size:24795 flags:1
>> Why that ? requested seek is -1.0, -0.04 is better than 0.94, don't you
>> think ?
> 
> Sure, then the previous was wrong. It wasn't clear to me that r18063
> did/was supposed to fix seeking.

It wasn't meant to fix them. When diffing I checked the new values and
they were better/not worse than before, and this case was especially
better, so updating them was IMHO ok, and was fixing FATE.

-- 
Baptiste COUDURIER                              GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
Key fingerprint                 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
checking for life_signs in -lkenny... no
FFmpeg maintainer                                  http://www.ffmpeg.org




More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog mailing list