[FFmpeg-cvslog] [ffmpeg.org]: r419 - trunk/src/shame

Ramiro Polla ramiro.polla
Fri Jan 15 20:23:46 CET 2010


On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:59 AM, diego <subversion at mplayerhq.hu> wrote:
> Author: diego
> Date: Fri Jan 15 11:59:27 2010
> New Revision: 419
>
> Log:
> VSO software is now compliant enough to remove them from the Hall of Shame.
>
> Modified:
> ? trunk/src/shame
>
> Modified: trunk/src/shame
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/src/shame ? ? Mon Jan ?4 20:45:01 2010 ? ? ? ?(r418)
> +++ trunk/src/shame ? ? Fri Jan 15 11:59:27 2010 ? ? ? ?(r419)
> @@ -176,8 +176,6 @@
> ?<ul>
> ?<li><a href="http://chromaplayer.com/" rel="nofollow">Chroma</a>,
> ?<a href="http://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue726">issue tracker entry</a></li>
> -<li><a href="http://www.vso-software.fr/products/convert_x_to_dvd/" rel="nofollow">ConvertXtoDVD</a>,
> -<a href="http://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue272">issue tracker entry</a></li>
> ?<li><a href="http://www.kandalu.net" rel="nofollow">Kandalu</a>,
> ?<a href="http://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue455">issue tracker entry</a></li>
> ?<li><a href="http://shedworx.com/" rel="nofollow">VoltaicHD</a>,

Should we not have some sort of "These are no longer in violation"
list? It would make violators see it is possible to repent and I hope
encourage them to take action.

Also at least add them to the FFmpeg-based Projects page?



More information about the ffmpeg-cvslog mailing list