[Ffmpeg-devel-irc] ffmpeg-devel.log.20181206

burek burek021 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 7 03:05:04 EET 2018


[12:53:51 CET] <JEEB> beep boop for https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/11258/ , https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/patch/11257/
[15:15:41 CET] <durandal_1707> h264 code is awfull
[15:16:19 CET] <alexpacio_> @durandal_1707: what do you mean?
[16:06:26 CET] <JEEB> durandal_1707: yea it has a lot of older stuff and it might not be simple to "get" into
[16:09:04 CET] <jamrial> plus years and years of "fix this one broken sample made by this one long discontinued cheap cctv camera" lines :p
[16:09:32 CET] <JEEB> yup
[16:09:50 CET] <jamrial> or workarounds so broken streams saved through udp can still output something somewhat recognizable as a video frame
[16:10:18 CET] <JEEB> thankfully a lot of the UDP I find is generally OK and the most I want is for a decoder to recover after the input un-fucks itself
[16:10:19 CET] <nevcairiel> good error resilience is really a good thing to have
[16:10:39 CET] <jamrial> sure, but doesn't change the fact it can make the code look awful
[16:10:45 CET] <JEEB> yup
[17:57:40 CET] <durandal_1707> people wrote shitty dav parsers clones, and now ffmpeg need to fight back!
[20:15:05 CET] <cone-766> ffmpeg 03Carl Eugen Hoyos 07master:b44a571dc4af: lavc/proresdec.h: Include a missing header
[22:04:47 CET] <atomnuker> I don't like opusenc_psy now, I want to start from scratch
[22:10:00 CET] <durandal_1707> anyone have link to v210 in mxf?
[22:15:26 CET] <jamrial> kierank may
[22:16:15 CET] <durandal_1707> sample
[23:46:58 CET] <durandal_1707> i got seizures when dealing with Carl
[00:00:00 CET] --- Fri Dec  7 2018


More information about the Ffmpeg-devel-irc mailing list