[Ffmpeg-devel] Re: Advocating periodic releases

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Fri Oct 13 12:16:39 CEST 2006


Hi

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 07:51:05PM -0700, Roman Shaposhnick wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 11:47 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > state diagram copy & pasted from an old bugzilla flame ...
> > ----------
> > Bugs:
> >    /<--------------------------\
> > New -> Verified -> Analyzed -> Fixed (-> Fixed&Checked)
> > ^\\\-> WorksForMe  | |     \-> WontFix
> > | \--> Duplicate <-/ |
> > v  --> Invalid <-----/
> > NeedMoreInfo
> 
>   This seems quite reasonable. 
> 
> > Patches:
> >    /<-(reverse)-\
> > New -> Ok -> Applied (->Applied&Checked)
> > ^  \-> Rejected
> > |
> > v
> > NeedsChanges
> 
>   I'm sorry, but how do patches tie in into bugtracking ? 

patchtracking :)
of course the idea is optional, and unrelated but it was part of the
original bugzilla flame from where i copy and pasted the stuff above


[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

In the past you could go to a library and read, borrow or copy any book
Today you'd get arrested for mere telling someone where the library is




More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list