[FFmpeg-devel] RoQ video encoder (take 3)

Vitor vitor1001
Mon Jun 11 23:38:50 CEST 2007


Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi


> also i dont think a constant number of bytes per frame is a good idea
> even less so considering the complexity of the current code (which sadly
> ive not completely reviewed yet, but i thought i better post some reply
> with a partial review instead of letting you wait for a week ...)

I'm doing quite a few modifications in the code, so if you didn't 
reviewed the rest, I'd prefer if you wait the next patch.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list