[FFmpeg-devel] RFC: setting format parameters from the URL

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Tue Apr 8 12:37:59 CEST 2008


On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 12:05:13PM +0200, Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:53:36AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > On date Tuesday 2008-04-08 03:00:08 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 09:17:40PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Furthermore, a quick search on Google Code Search seems to indicate that
> > > > ffmpeg is the only application supporting AVOption. Which I find not really
> > > > surprising, since AVOption seems undocumented, 
> > > 
> > > Patches documenting it are welcome, patches reimplementing the functionality
> > > are not.
> > 
> > I have already such a patch, I'm posting it into another thread.
> > 
> > BTW, there is some particular reason for which AVOptions has been
> > implemented in libavcodec rather than in libavutil (and would be
> > reasonable to move the code there at the next libavcodec major bump?)
> 
> Is there actually a need for a major version bump? lavc already depends
> on lavu always, so IMO there should not be a binary compatibility
> problem, and the lavc header could just include the new lavu one.

> But I had assumed that AVOption needs some things from lavc, which is
> why it is still there.

our simple arithmetic expression evaluator ...

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony.
-- Heraclitus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080408/57410f30/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list