[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Provide a context to the ffmpeg -r option

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Sat Aug 23 03:24:38 CEST 2008


On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 01:51:37AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Friday 2008-08-22 23:40:45 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 08:06:05PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > On date Monday 2008-08-11 15:29:39 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > [...]
> > > > > > I object, not strongly but i think this is not good for anything.
> > > > > > Like if it aint broken dont fix it ...
> > [...]
> > > Ping? (trying to clean my mailbox...)
> > 
> > i already gave my oppinion ...
> 
> Yes but I thought for a moment which I could convice you with my
> exceptional argumentative skills...
> 
> > your options are to either drop the patch or apply it anyway or make this
> > issue more flameworthy to get replies from others ...
> 
> Option two is nice but I'm not sure is legal, I don't know what you
> mean with "not strong objection", otherwise I can quite happily
> withstand life with option one.

"not strong objection" means i wont call the 3 horse riders of the apocalypse
immedeatly to deal with you ;)

seriously, i do not mind if you apply it if it doesnz break anything and you
see any sense in this change. Just expect me to flame you if it does break
anything

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know
nothing. -- Socrates
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080823/6c99754c/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list