[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Provide a context to the ffmpeg -r option

[Stefano Sabatini]

On date Saturday 2008-08-23 03:24:38 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 01:51:37AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > On date Friday 2008-08-22 23:40:45 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 08:06:05PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > > On date Monday 2008-08-11 15:29:39 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > > [...]
> > > > > > > I object, not strongly but i think this is not good for anything.
> > > > > > > Like if it aint broken dont fix it ...
> > > [...]
> > > > Ping? (trying to clean my mailbox...)
> > > 
> > > i already gave my oppinion ...
> > 
> > Yes but I thought for a moment which I could convice you with my
> > exceptional argumentative skills...
> > 
> > > your options are to either drop the patch or apply it anyway or make this
> > > issue more flameworthy to get replies from others ...
> > 
> > Option two is nice but I'm not sure is legal, I don't know what you
> > mean with "not strong objection", otherwise I can quite happily
> > withstand life with option one.
> 
> "not strong objection" means i wont call the 3 horse riders of the apocalypse
> immedeatly to deal with you ;)

lol

> seriously, i do not mind if you apply it if it doesnz break anything and you
> see any sense in this change. Just expect me to flame you if it does break
> anything

Well, that's part of the policy, isn't it?

And patch applied.

Regards.
-- 
FFmpeg = Funny and Foolish Majestic Pitiful Elastic Genius