[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Warn about PAFF & Spatial

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:02:01AM -0700, Serguei Miridonov wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:54:06AM -0400, Mark Buechler wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos 
> <cehoyos at ag.or.at> wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > Michael Niedermayer <michaelni <at> gmx.at> writes:
> > > > > > Should I remove the warning?
> > > > >
> > > > > I have no objections.
> > > >
> > > > Reverted r13542.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for the mess, Carl Eugen
> > >
> > > Ok, myself and others are now confused as to whether PAFF +
> > > spatial direct is really fully supported. The samples provided
> > > show errors but are those errors now thought to be caused by some
> > > other issue? Could perhaps the samples be incorrect?
> >
> > Debug the code
> > Cleanup the code
> > and dont forget sending patches.
> >
> > If i knew where the problem is exactly i would fix it.
> > Besides i honestly dont care about PAFF & MBAFF at all.
> 
> Michael, I do not ask you why just because this is a developing list. 
> But could you please post a few links which you think best explain 
> pro and contra of 24/p video? For me 60/i video looks much much 
> smoother than 24/p. On TV or computer monitor -- does not matter. So, 

then use 60/p

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being
governed by those who are dumber. -- Plato 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080723/7108c968/attachment.pgp>