[FFmpeg-devel] DVCPRO-HD bounty offered

[Armando Di Cianno]

Ahh; I understand now.

I would officially like to clarify what I consider the goal of the bounty:

"A patch which is accepted into FFmpeg SVN mainline that offers
DVCPRO-HD support as previously described."

__armando

P.S. If a team works on the patch that gets accepted, and would like
to donate the money to the FFmpeg project itself (is that possible?)
my company is amenable to that situation as well.

On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <rvs at sun.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 19:23 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>> Armando Di Cianno wrote:
>>
>> > Roman,
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Roman V. Shaposhnik <rvs at sun.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>> company that submits a patch against the current FFmpeg svn trunk
>> >>> that successfully decodes DVCPRO-HD.
>> >>
>> >> That said, I believe it would be much more desirable for the
>> >> project in general to have a slightly different goal for the bounty
>> >> in mind: integration of the DVCPRO-HD codec functionality into the
>> >> trunk of the FFmpeg mainline.
>> >
>> > That is actually what I meant by "current FFmpeg svn trunk" -- the
>> > actual FFmpeg mainline that everyone uses if they checkout FFmpeg
>> > from the FFmpeg project pages.  The experimental branch you have
>> > seems a bit out of date compared to mainline FFmpeg -- making it
>> > easier to integrate various patches, but harder to make a clean patch
>> > against mainline FFmpeg.
>>
>> I think Roman meant not that he thought you were suggesting a patch
>> against something other than the FFmpeg "mainline", but that the goal
>> should be not "a patch submitted against FFmpeg SVN" but "a patch which
>> is accepted into FFmpeg SVN".
>
> Exactly!
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at mplayerhq.hu
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>