[FFmpeg-devel] asm vs __asm__: revenge of the underscores
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Fri Oct 3 11:08:06 CEST 2008
"Roman V. Shaposhnik" <rvs at sun.com> writes:
>> I'm not sure if it's "worth addressing", __asm__ seems a proper way to
>> remember that it's _not_ a C99 feature,
> Well, strictly speaking both __asm__ and asm(...) are *NOT* C99
> *features*. asm(...) is a suggested extension that's all.
Yeah indeed, but it's easier to remember that __asm__ is not standard,
since it's underscore-encosed; asm() makes it sound like it's part of
the language itself.
Diego "Flameeyes" Petten?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ffmpeg-devel