[FFmpeg-devel] asm vs __asm__: revenge of the underscores

[Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò]

"Roman V. Shaposhnik" <rvs at sun.com> writes:

>> I'm not sure if it's "worth addressing", __asm__ seems a proper way to
>> remember that it's _not_ a C99 feature, 
>
> Well, strictly speaking both __asm__ and asm(...) are *NOT* C99
> *features*. asm(...) is a suggested extension that's all.

Yeah indeed, but it's easier to remember that __asm__ is not standard,
since it's underscore-encosed; asm() makes it sound like it's part of
the language itself.

-- 
Diego "Flameeyes" Petten?
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20081003/781484aa/attachment.pgp>