[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] g722 decoder, no licensing fame

Kenan Gillet kenan.gillet
Fri Apr 10 19:33:32 CEST 2009

On Apr 9, 2009, at 10:01 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:22:48AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> i have good news and bad news
>> the good are that quality might be significatly improvable by using
>> trellis/viterbi, the bad news is that the encoder is rejected unless
>> you either implement that or proof that it cant be done
>> (and i dont mean full viterbi but keeping more than 1 possible
>> previous bitstream that is not just 1 previous and the best current
>> quantized value but several best past ones X several current  
>> quantized
>> values ...)
> Kenan, submit the decoder first, you can worry about the encoder  
> later.

thanks Diego, I'll do that


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list