[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Second try at pixdesc.h:write_line()

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Wed Apr 22 01:32:39 CEST 2009


On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:08:23PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> On date Monday 2009-04-20 00:00:53 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:08:42PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > On date Sunday 2009-04-19 20:30:01 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 06:43:15PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > Well but I was looking for a more general solution, for which this one
> > > > > couldn't work.
> > > > 
> > > > but why? which pixel format can not be handled?
> > > 
> > > I didn't know that, I supposed that there could be in this wild wild
> > > world, now I'm happy that there are not. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > BTW, should be change accordingly read_line()?
> > > > 
> > > > i cant parse this sentance
> > > 
> > > I meant:
> > > "BTW, should we change read_line() accordingly?
> > > 
> > > What I meant was to remove dependancy on get_bits.h, like in the
> > > attached patch.
> > 
> > benchmark?
[...]
> [...] 
> > cosmetic & functional mix
> 
> Fixed.

ok if tested

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Why not whip the teacher when the pupil misbehaves? -- Diogenes of Sinope
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090422/6a8fa775/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list