[FFmpeg-devel] libavfilter-soc update and variable frame size/pixel format
Wed Jul 1 01:11:06 CEST 2009
On date Monday 2009-06-29 21:57:04 +0200, Stefano Sabatini encoded:
> On date Monday 2009-06-29 21:01:15 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:54:38PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > On date Monday 2009-06-29 01:26:11 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:05:19AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
> > > > > Hi, since r19226/19279 ffmpeg supports variable frame size/pixel
> > > > > formats.
> > > > >
> > > > > I managed to update libavfilter-soc, and my current solution is to
> > > > > simply don't support it if libavfilter is enabled.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's because those are ones of the problem lavfi should natively
> > > > > manage, rather than leave the problem to the application, also I don't
> > > > > want to spend time on this since that will be removed anyway once it
> > > > > will be supported by the lavfi framework.
> > > > >
> > > > > See updating patch attached, OK to apply?
> > > >
> > > > i dont review diffs of diffs :)
> > >
> > > In attachment the diff. Note that I'm just keeping the old behaviour
> > > when CONFIG_AVFILTER is enabled.
> > i also dont review that
> > we have A ---diff1--->B
> > and
> > we have A ---diff1--diff2->B
> > i review diff2, i wont review a combined diff1+diff2 nor a diff between
> > diff1 and diff1+2
> > not sure why you post the change like this ...
> The diff of diff still looks to me the more readable alternative,
> considering that the difference between the two patched versions
> (19066 and 19289) contains many diffs related to the ffmpeg
> Also to get such a patch is quite painful, and that was the reason for
> which I avoided it the first time, to get it I had to go through:
> svn export svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk/ffmpeg.c ffmpeg.c.r19XXX -r 19XXX
> patch -p0 < ../diffs/02_ffmpeg_filters.diff.r19XXX
> svn export svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk/ffmpeg.c ffmpeg.c.r19YYY -r 19YYY
> patch -p0 < ../diffs/02_ffmpeg_filters.diff.r19YYY
> diff -u ffmpeg.c.r19XXX ffmpeg.c.r19YYY > patch
> Note that the new version passes regression tests as before (that is all but the
> old mxdf10 one), so I believe it should quite safe to apply it.
Ping? Please don't let this die out, this is blocking to me since I
want to keep updated libavfilter-soc against SVN.
FFmpeg = Fantastic & Faithless Mournful Perennial Ephemeral Geisha
More information about the ffmpeg-devel