[FFmpeg-devel] libavfilter-soc update and variable frame size/pixel format

Baptiste Coudurier baptiste.coudurier
Wed Jul 1 19:22:36 CEST 2009

Hi Michael,

Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:57:04PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>> On date Monday 2009-06-29 21:01:15 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 08:54:38PM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>>>> On date Monday 2009-06-29 01:26:11 +0200, Michael Niedermayer encoded:
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 01:05:19AM +0200, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
>>>>>> Hi, since r19226/19279 ffmpeg supports variable frame size/pixel
>>>>>> formats.
>>>>>> I managed to update libavfilter-soc, and my current solution is to
>>>>>> simply don't support it if libavfilter is enabled.
>>>>>> That's because those are ones of the problem lavfi should natively
>>>>>> manage, rather than leave the problem to the application, also I don't
>>>>>> want to spend time on this since that will be removed anyway once it
>>>>>> will be supported by the lavfi framework.
>>>>>> See updating patch attached, OK to apply?
>>>>> i dont review diffs of diffs :)
>>>> In attachment the diff. Note that I'm just keeping the old behaviour
>>>> when CONFIG_AVFILTER is enabled.
>>> i also dont review that
>>> we have A ---diff1--->B
>>> and
>>> we have A ---diff1--diff2->B
>>> i review diff2, i wont review a combined diff1+diff2 nor a diff between
>>> diff1 and diff1+2
>>> not sure why you post the change like this ...
>> The diff of diff still looks to me the more readable alternative,
>> considering that the difference between the two patched versions
>> (19066 and 19289) contains many diffs related to the ffmpeg
>> development.
>> Also to get such a patch is quite painful, and that was the reason for
>> which I avoided it the first time, to get it I had to go through:
>> svn export svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk/ffmpeg.c ffmpeg.c.r19XXX -r 19XXX
>> patch -p0 < ../diffs/02_ffmpeg_filters.diff.r19XXX
>> svn export svn://svn.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg/trunk/ffmpeg.c ffmpeg.c.r19YYY -r 19YYY
>> patch -p0 < ../diffs/02_ffmpeg_filters.diff.r19YYY
>> diff -u ffmpeg.c.r19XXX  ffmpeg.c.r19YYY > patch
>> Note that the new version passes regression tests as before (that is all but the
>> old mxdf10 one), so I believe it should quite safe to apply it.
>> Regards.
>> -- 
>> FFmpeg = Forgiving & Faboulous Merciful Patchable Evangelical Gangster
>>  ffmpeg.c.r19289 |  161 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>> 2763717cd64dbdcf3590f734da6a1a4215fbca3d  patched-ffmpeg-10966-19289.patch
> patch rejected, mixes unrelated changes
> note, before you waste more of our both time, acceptable patches are either
> 1. mechanical updates that is application of changes from ffmpeg svn that
>    are not in soc yet.
> 2. clean patches passing the full set of rules about clean patches 
> In that sense i like to again mention, that lavfi should be moved into ffmpeg
> svn quickly because it does become more painfull with time (now a merge
> _requires_ support for changing width/height as well, a short while ago it
> didnt but now it would be a feature regression)

Can you or someone else please state what needs to be done to finallly
move lavfi into ffmpeg svn ? Maybe it would be possible to help.

Baptiste COUDURIER                              GnuPG Key Id: 0x5C1ABAAA
Key fingerprint                 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
FFmpeg maintainer                                  http://www.ffmpeg.org

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list