[FFmpeg-devel] Additional RTSP issues

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Wed Jul 15 23:02:05 CEST 2009

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:41:38AM -0700, Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
> Hi,
> On 7/15/2009 12:06 AM, Luca Abeni wrote:
> > [...]
> > 
> >> Maybe just taking the first X correct timestamps, then approximate
> >> backwards
> >> for the non-stamped packets?
> > Well, after receiving the first RTCP SR (and having the first reliable
> > timestamp),
> What about discarding packets until RTCP SR is received ?
> It is streaming, user won't care about loosing a few frames at the
> beginning but will definitely prefer having correct timestamps, like
> this thread proves.

i agree the user likely wont care about loosing a few frames but the user
might care about extra delay, i mean something hypothetical like
"why does ffplay need 10sec before playback starts while barfoo starts
immedeatly ..."


Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Many things microsoft did are stupid, but not doing something just because
microsoft did it is even more stupid. If everything ms did were stupid they
would be bankrupt already.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090715/8f0f3870/attachment.pgp>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list