[FFmpeg-devel] project task redundancy (was: Re: [PATCH]Remove unused parameter from rotozoom.c)

Diego Biurrun diego
Wed Jul 22 15:22:04 CEST 2009

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:17:55PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 08:28:32AM +0000, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Michael Niedermayer <michaelni <at> gmx.at> writes:
> [...]
> > > Avoid a single point of failure, be that a person or equipment.
> > 
> > Has this anything to do with FFmpeg?
> it does
> * we have 3 roots, 1 alone would be bad

how true..

> * we should have several redudnant www servers like mphq, well ...

We have DNS round-robin for mplayerhq.hu, we could try to get mirrors
for ffmpeg.org as well.  Currently the load is not a big problem.

> * bug tracker and svn are on seperate servers, allowing us to
>   continue working on ffmpeg (svn down -> bugfixing by using git checkout
>   roundup down -> normal work and commits to ffmpeg)

I'd rather move roundup to mphq at some point, polito.it is very flaky..

> what we lack ATM is more people reviewing code ...

The little I do is my very best :)

But I must agree, it would help a lot if people helped to review code..

Maybe we should install a

R edundant
A rray of
I nexpensive
D evelopers



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list