[FFmpeg-devel] MXF D10 regression tests

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Mon Mar 16 19:29:23 CET 2009


On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 04:38:44PM +0100, Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 04:33:29PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 04:23:58PM +0100, Reimar D?ffinger wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:42:02PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > anyway if someone wants to debug this first thing would be finding a minimal
> > > > set of command line options that still cause the difference.
> > > 
> > > Looks like
> > > ./ffmpeg_g -y -flags +bitexact -dct fastint -idct simple -sws_flags
> > > +accurate_rnd+bitexact -t 1 -qscale 10 -f image2 -vcodec pgmyuv -i
> > > ./tests/vsynth1/%02d.pgm -s 720x576 -vcodec mpeg2video -pix_fmt yuv422p
> > > -an -f framecrc -
> > > 
> > > does it, though -s 736x576 works. So the issue seems to be:
> > > width not divisible by 32 combined with yuv422p
> > 
> > does it work with raw? (that would awsner if its encoder or scaler issue)
> 
> Oh, forgot to mention it. Yes, results match when just replacing
> mpeg2video with rawvideo.

good so how does it look? i mean is there a vissible error when decoding
is it limited to chroma? luma? right border? left border?

is decoding differing as well? i mean the x86 encoded decodes the same on
both ? the ppc one ...

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Concerning the gods, I have no means of knowing whether they exist or not
or of what sort they may be, because of the obscurity of the subject, and
the brevity of human life -- Protagoras
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20090316/ece2a9c2/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list