[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] asfenc: fix extended content header

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 09:40:49AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 02:36:00AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > 
> > do you know if this is the only case where this value is used?
> > iam against skiping cases that where not skiped before without a very
> > good reason.
> > And especially "one file putted trash in there" is not a good reason at all
> > what does the spec say?
> > do we have other files using this?
> > 
> 
> the specs don't say much about tags with value type==byte array, but it
> seems people can put pretty much any binary data in there and there's no
> reason to expect it to be readable strings. all the files i've tested
> confirm that.

if its really useless it could be skiped with a AV_LOG_DEBUG msg
anyway, what are the names of these byte array valued tags?

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

No great genius has ever existed without some touch of madness. -- Aristotle
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100220/e57f461f/attachment.pgp>