[FFmpeg-devel] [VOTE] 1st/3rd person doxy

[Måns Rullgård]

Baptiste Coudurier <baptiste.coudurier at gmail.com> writes:

> On 07/08/2010 07:45 PM, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>> Baptiste Coudurier<baptiste.coudurier at gmail.com>  writes:
>>
>>> On 07/08/2010 07:10 PM, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>>>> Jason Garrett-Glaser<darkshikari at gmail.com>   writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Michael Niedermayer<michaelni at gmx.at>   wrote:
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i get no free time and no sleep :(
>>>>>> heres the vote about the most important bikeshed this year.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> following options exist, also our script can handle people dynamically
>>>>>> adding new options and options rated equal but it cant handle it if you
>>>>>> dont duplicate my typos so copy&   paste them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> things should be listed and numbered in order of preferrance, with most
>>>>>> favored at the top
>>>>>> voting method in case they differ is the schulze methode and voting
>>>>>> application is svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/michael/trunk/ffvotetov
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. add a 1st person rule to policy
>>>>>> 2. 1st or 3rd person as the maintainer prefers, no addition to policy needed
>>>>>> 3. add a 3rd person rule to policy
>>>>>> 4. further discussion
>>>>>> 5. add a 1st person perogative rule to policy
>>>>>
>>>>> 6.  Votes like this are stupid.
>>>>
>>>> I vote 6.
>>>
>>> Your votes are considered void.
>>
>> What do you imagine gives you the authority to make such proclamations?
>
> I assumed that you cannot vote for a non-existent item. In this case,
> it makes these votes, void.
>
> However it seems that you can add new options, I'm against that btw.

Too bad for you you're not allowed to remove options.

-- 
M?ns Rullg?rd
mans at mansr.com