[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] update doc/optimization.txt

Michael Niedermayer michaelni
Mon Sep 20 15:31:31 CEST 2010


On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:53:45PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 06:23:16PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> >> "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbultje at gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > $subj, fixes a typo and mentions yasm.
> >> >
> >> > I could word it stronger ("if you write new code, yasm is preferred
> >> > for non-inlined functions") if we can agree on that (which I don't
> >> > think we do yet).
> >>
> >> Does anyone who actually writes any asm nowadays disagree?
> >
> > i dont know, but the one maintaining the x86 asm does and the project
> > leader disagrees too
> 
> So is the patch as posted ok then?

ive no oppinon on this it feels a bit moving toward inconsistent asm mix
though

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Observe your enemies, for they first find out your faults. -- Antisthenes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100920/a1a844b3/attachment.pgp>



More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list