[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/3] doc: issue tracking: fix grammar/spelling

Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at
Wed Aug 31 20:07:25 CEST 2011

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:22:08PM +0200, Alexander Strasser wrote:
> Hi
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Speaking of that, i think the 2 flags could be renamed to
> > Analyzed by developer and Reproduced by developer
> > anyone against? other ideas?
>   To avoid the ambiguity between analyzed/reproduced by developer
> vs reporter?

IIRC ive seen reporters set reproduced=yes and while we probably
could just make it impossible for them to set it. Simply changing
the name to make it unambiguous seems better to me.

>   Anyway I would like to commit this patch series as is. IMHO it
> still is an improvement. I will try to continue working on that
> document to better reflect current practice afterwards.

absolutely agree

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Asymptotically faster algorithms should always be preferred if you have
asymptotical amounts of data
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20110831/36e0e844/attachment.asc>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list