[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Non-blocking protocols: flag and documentation

Luca Barbato lu_zero
Sat Feb 5 20:04:20 CET 2011


On 02/04/2011 08:01 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Nicolas George
> <nicolas.george at normalesup.org> wrote:
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas George <nicolas.george at normalesup.org>
>> ---
>>  doc/APIchanges     |    3 +++
>>  libavformat/avio.h |   29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>>  Changes since the last time I sent these patches:
>>
>>  - First one (factor poll in TCP) got applied; rest rebased on the current
>>   head.
>>
>>  - Doxygen group for URL_RDONLY/URL_RDWR/URL_WRONLY.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> I'm basically willing to apply this, I'm wondering if we need a flag
> to indicate which URLProtocols support non-blocking opening. Anyone
> have opinions on this? Or should we just assume it'll always be
> supported for all protocols? (Does file/pipe/etc. support it now?)

I'm ok with the patch, I'm not sure which protocol should not support
non-blocking but if we implement some kind of hardware specific protocol
it might have some specificities.

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero




More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list