[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/3] web:bugreports: Clarify that all needed info should be there

Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at
Sun Aug 12 14:47:46 CEST 2012


On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 08:34:34PM -0800, Lou Logan wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012, at 06:40 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
> > ---
> >  src/bugreports |    2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/bugreports b/src/bugreports index 965f8e4..ee5177b
> > 100644 --- a/src/bugreports +++ b/src/bugreports @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
> > When writing your bug report, please include (uncompressed):
> > (copy/pasted from the console, including the banner that indicates
> > version and configuration options), paste <code>ffplay</code> output
> > only if your problem is not reproducible with ffmpeg.</li>
> > +  <li>Everything else that we need or need to know to be able to
> >    reproduce the
> > +      bug, and confirm a potential fix</li>
> 
> Does "confirm a potential fix" refer to a patch or suggestion from the
> bug reporter? I'm not totally clear about this phrase.

it refers to
a patch from the reporter || a potential fix created in response to the report
(and similar things)


[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem
            conveniently.
New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer
            can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20120812/5b282b74/attachment.asc>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list