[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ffv1enc: Make ffv1.3 non experimental

Paul B Mahol onemda at gmail.com
Sat Aug 17 13:22:19 CEST 2013


On 8/17/13, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:38:07AM +0000, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> On 8/17/13, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 09:29:35AM +0000, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> >> On 8/17/13, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
>> >> > The fate tests change as they used 1.2 previously
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at>
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  libavcodec/ffv1enc.c          |    4 ++--
>> >> >  tests/fate/vcodec.mak         |    2 +-
>> >> >  tests/ref/seek/vsynth2-ffv1   |   40
>> >> > ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> >> >  tests/ref/vsynth/vsynth1-ffv1 |    4 ++--
>> >> >  tests/ref/vsynth/vsynth2-ffv1 |    4 ++--
>> >> >  5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> So 1.2 coverage is now 0% ?
>> >
>> > testing should concentrate on non experimental variants.
>> > 1.2 is experimental and cannot be used unless the user explicitly
>> > enables experimental code.
>> > That means noone should be using it, no files should exist in the wild
>> > and thus testing it probably makes no sense
>>
>> Ah. so previously 1.2 was tested for no reason at all?
>
> prior to 1.3 we tested 1.2
>
>
>>
>> What about 1.1 and older version coverage?, that's why original
>> question...
>
> improving fates coverage was and is welcome

Sorry but not me. You as mainter of ffv1 are first on line.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list