[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] ffv1enc: Make ffv1.3 non experimental

Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at
Sat Aug 17 20:19:10 CEST 2013

On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 08:14:19PM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On 17.08.2013, at 20:00, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > 
> >> isn't that the responsibility of the
> >> container, if it should be inside the file at all?
> > 
> > containers generally dont provide such checksums, even less so at
> > slice level. 
> Isn't it a checksum of the uncompressed data anyway? A container can't provide that and it only makes sense for lossless anyway.

its of the compressed data (less data-> faster) and crc has various
properties which would be lost if its applied in a different domain
than the one where errors occur

Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Breaking DRM is a little like attempting to break through a door even
though the window is wide open and the only thing in the house is a bunch
of things you dont want and which you would get tomorrow for free anyway
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20130817/6a9b5189/attachment.asc>

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list