[FFmpeg-devel] [OPENCL] a idea to get a better performance of the OPENCL video filter

[weixuan wang]

Would it be an alternative to only have one
opencl filter that supports unsharp, deshake
and all future features?
yes, it will be an alternative to the all of the filters which supports the
OPENCL.

Or will all filters really be implemented very
similar to the existing filters (with identical
options) so that it makes perfectly sense to
have them in one source file together with the
existing filters and as the same filter for
the users?
yes, it will be  implemented very similar to the existing filters, but only
the filters which supports the OPENCL need this function to improve their
performance.





2013/6/26 Carl Eugen Hoyos <cehoyos at ag.or.at>

> weixuan wang <batmanwwx <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > if the first video filter is using the OPENCL
> > and the next video filter is using the OPENCL
> > too, we can remove the output data copying of
> > the first video filter and the input data
> > copying of the next video filter.
>
> Would it be an alternative to only have one
> opencl filter that supports unsharp, deshake
> and all future features?
>
> Or will all filters really be implemented very
> similar to the existing filters (with identical
> options) so that it makes perfectly sense to
> have them in one source file together with the
> existing filters and as the same filter for
> the users?
>
> Carl Eugen
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>