[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] doc: rewrite developer documentation

Thilo Borgmann thilo.borgmann at mail.de
Thu Oct 17 21:53:29 CEST 2013

Am 17.10.13 20:21, schrieb Timothy Gu:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Thilo Borgmann <thilo.borgmann at mail.de> wrote:
>> Am 17.08.13 12:06, schrieb Michael Niedermayer:
>>> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 03:11:40AM +0200, Thilo Borgmann wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I started with including some text about pull requests...
>>>> I ended with a rewrite of almost the whole page, removing (IMHO) outdated info,
>>>> removing redundant info, rewording many things.
>>>> Most important for me is that this rewrite reorders things that seemed to have
>>>> become too confusing in the old page.
>>>> This is an RFC and not yet completely finished. If people tend to like the new
>>>> design better than the old page, I will try to finish it and round it up for
>>>> review. Please give me feedback for the overall redesign - if any detail
>>>> information is missing in your eyes, this can be added later.
>>>> -Thilo
>>>> The following changes since commit faf7c356554d54be0ddb5f989791407e23753549:
>>>>   lavf/tee: add support for bitstream filtering (2013-08-16 17:58:58 +0200)
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>   git at github.com:thiloborgmann/FFmpeg.git doc_developer
>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 6f93ecdbf119640b2b0be34fd2a576c92c34d287:
>>>>   doc: rewrite developer documentation (2013-08-17 02:42:00 +0200)
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Thilo Borgmann (1):
>>>>       doc: rewrite developer documentation
>>>>  doc/developer.texi | 1000 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>>>>  1 file changed, 493 insertions(+), 507 deletions(-)
>>> this is far too many changes to review in one piece, please split this
>>> up
>> I'm going to make a paragrph-wise commit for detailed review.
>> In the mean time I would appreciate it if everyone interested in this would open
>> a browser and reply if this rearrangement of the page is worth the effort or if
>> we all could spare the time :)
>> -Thilo
> Ping. How is the patch going?

Nobody replied about the reordering, so I abandoned it thinking it's not worth
the effort.

Feel free to spilt it up and send again if you want to have this merged. Chances
are I will pick it up again when I have more spare time to work on - but that
not a big chance, I'm delaying more important thing already.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list