[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/4] avutil/tablegen: add tablegen libm compatibility shims

Ganesh Ajjanagadde gajjanag at mit.edu
Wed Dec 2 01:08:59 CET 2015

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanag at mit.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Derek Buitenhuis
> <derek.buitenhuis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 11/28/2015 7:51 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> In principle of course, e.g with more ifdefry, configure, or something
>>> of that sort. I do not believe this is what he meant.
>> I will await his reply to clarify, then. Perhaps do not write so matter-of-factly.
>>> In any case, the point is moot - the implementations are not broken -
>>> if they are, avutil/libm needs fixing as well.
>> Now, yes. It would certainly be nice if this was noted somewhere in the patch notes
>> (not necessarily in the commit messages). There are quite a few threads on the list
>> from you now regarding tablegen, and it can be a pain in the butt / tedious to figure
>> out how the current version differs from the N others.
> I assumed from the cover letter that this supersedes all such prior
> stuff. Anyway, will attempt but can't guarantee improvements in
> future.
>>>> Anyway, shouldn't this patce dropped, since 79abf2d0ded860acf505de22c4f7a750e5e98446
>>>> removed hardcoded tables anyway?
>>> No, if you actually read even the first line of the commit message,
>>> you can see it was only for aac, not for this patch series.
>> Indeed, I misread, and missed the 'aac_'. You could certainly be less of
>> an ass about it, though.
> Sorry about that. Please do continue to call me out on such things; I
> do not like unpleasantness on ffmpeg-devel.

pushed, thanks

>> - Derek
>> _______________________________________________
>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
>> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list