[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Changelog: add note on dynaudnorm availability on all platforms
h.leppkes at gmail.com
Thu Dec 24 00:29:44 CET 2015
Am 23.12.2015 19:47 schrieb "Ganesh Ajjanagadde" <gajjanag at mit.edu>:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com>
> > Am 23.12.2015 18:30 schrieb "Ganesh Ajjanagadde" <gajjanagadde at gmail.com
> >> Commits 062e3e23824ba3d25594ea966d7834bcf34db49b and
> >> dd68cde28a44bbf5307d29ee6cb8ebd14985dea5 added support for erf and
> >> copysign on broken libms, and so dynaudnorm is now available on all
> >> platforms.
> >> This is user facing; hence the Changelog entry.
> >> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde at gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> Changelog | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >> diff --git a/Changelog b/Changelog
> >> index 2b46ddb..bb29afb 100644
> >> --- a/Changelog
> >> +++ b/Changelog
> >> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ version <next>:
> >> - DXVA2-accelerated VP9 decoding
> >> - SOFAlizer: virtual binaural acoustics filter
> >> - VAAPI VP9 hwaccel
> >> +- dynaudnorm filter availability on all platforms
> >> version 2.8:
> >> --
> >> 2.6.4
> > dynaudnorm hasnt been in any previous release, has it? IIRC its still
> > new itself, so no need for a change log entry IMHO.
> As Paul points out, it was added in 2.8. It was for this precise
> reason that I wondered about the Changelog. So is the summary that the
> patch is ok (or neutral)? In other words, does anyone oppose it?
Personally I wouldn't care that much to mention it in the change log, but
its not like I would oppose it, so if Paul as the author of the filter
feels its fine, then LGTM as well.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel