[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Changelog: add note on dynaudnorm availability on all platforms

[Ganesh Ajjanagadde]

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com> wrote:
> Am 23.12.2015 19:47 schrieb "Ganesh Ajjanagadde" <gajjanag at mit.edu>:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Hendrik Leppkes <h.leppkes at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> > Am 23.12.2015 18:30 schrieb "Ganesh Ajjanagadde" <gajjanagadde at gmail.com
>>:
>> >>
>> >> Commits 062e3e23824ba3d25594ea966d7834bcf34db49b and
>> >> dd68cde28a44bbf5307d29ee6cb8ebd14985dea5 added support for erf and
>> >> copysign on broken libms, and so dynaudnorm is now available on all
>> >> platforms.
>> >>
>> >> This is user facing; hence the Changelog entry.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde at gmail.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  Changelog | 1 +
>> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/Changelog b/Changelog
>> >> index 2b46ddb..bb29afb 100644
>> >> --- a/Changelog
>> >> +++ b/Changelog
>> >> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ version <next>:
>> >>  - DXVA2-accelerated VP9 decoding
>> >>  - SOFAlizer: virtual binaural acoustics filter
>> >>  - VAAPI VP9 hwaccel
>> >> +- dynaudnorm filter availability on all platforms
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  version 2.8:
>> >> --
>> >> 2.6.4
>> >>
>> >
>> > dynaudnorm hasnt been in any previous release, has it? IIRC its still
> very
>> > new itself, so no need for a change log entry IMHO.
>>
>> As Paul points out, it was added in 2.8. It was for this precise
>> reason that I wondered about the Changelog. So is the summary that the
>> patch is ok (or neutral)? In other words, does anyone oppose it?
>>
>
> Personally I wouldn't care that much to mention it in the change log, but
> its not like I would oppose it, so if Paul as the author of the filter
> feels its fine, then LGTM as well.

Dropped, no real consensus on these things and since I am not much of
a user of FFmpeg, I don't really know whether they obtain value from
these things in the Changelog. Thanks.

> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel