[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCHv2] flac: ignore IDv3 tags if vorbis tags exist
lou at lrcd.com
Tue Feb 3 02:02:10 CET 2015
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015, at 03:40 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> Yes, and?
> Point one: ID3 won, it is generally supported. Insisting on something
> else IMHO is just being a pain on the user for little reason and nothing
> we should strive to emulate.
I simply don't want to see ffmpeg output files that are broken when the
"specs" are fairly straigtforward, and I don't want to make things
harder for users. I never said I wanted the ID3 to be ignored.
I think that if non-Vorbis comments exist, and Vorbis comments are
missing, then converting them to Vorbis comment would be the best
solution. If both exist then ignore the non-Vorbis comments. I admit I
don't know how challenging that may or may not be.
Either way, I like the idea of a warning or info informing the user
whatever we do.
> Point two: If despite that warning a ID3 tag exists, it seems sensible to
> assume it does so for a good reason and shouldn't be ignored.
The "good reason" being a crappy tagger?
I wonder what the percentage is of flacs with only ID3 or whatever, only
Vorbis comment, or a mix. I have no idea.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel