[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] doc/developer: s/ffmpeg-cvslog/ffmpeg-devel

James Almer jamrial at gmail.com
Sun Sep 20 02:30:56 CEST 2015


On 9/19/2015 8:54 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 7:48 PM, James Almer <jamrial at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 9/19/2015 8:36 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>>> ffmpeg has not been using cvs for a long time.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ganesh Ajjanagadde <gajjanagadde at gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  doc/developer.texi | 2 +-
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi
>>> index 7324629..923ee69 100644
>>> --- a/doc/developer.texi
>>> +++ b/doc/developer.texi
>>> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ timeframe (12h for build failures and security fixes, 3 days small changes,
>>>  Also note, the maintainer can simply ask for more time to review!
>>>
>>>  @item
>>> -Subscribe to the ffmpeg-cvslog mailing list. The diffs of all commits
>>> +Subscribe to the ffmpeg-devel mailing list. The diffs of all commits
>>>  are sent there and reviewed by all the other developers. Bugs and possible
>>>  improvements or general questions regarding commits are discussed there. We
>>>  expect you to react if problems with your code are uncovered.
>>
>> https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-cvslog/
>>
>> ffmpeg-cvslog has a different purpose than ffmpeg-devel.
> 
> Isn't the same information available at
> https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/?
> Can you tell me what the difference between the two is?

If you check and compare the emails between the two list, you'll notice that one
is a list where automated emails are sent every time something is committed to
the git repo, and the other is a list where patches are sent for review.


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list