[FFmpeg-devel] some thoughts on the website and warnings

Ganesh Ajjanagadde gajjanag at mit.edu
Wed Sep 23 03:12:56 CEST 2015


On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Calvin,
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:35 PM, Calvin Walton <calvin.walton at kepstin.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2015-09-19 at 12:36 -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote:
>> > Regarding the large array of platforms, as can be seen from the
>> > patches I have submitted over the past few weeks, one long term goal
>> > I
>> > have is getting to a "nearly -Werror" state at least on the most
>> > recent clang/gcc. Already notice that most warnings are from older
>> > compilers, non clang/gcc, windows, etc, which in many cases give us
>> > nothing (since newer ones anyway warn for the good ones).
>> > Nevertheless, these are occasionally useful.
>> >
>> > Latest clang/gcc are on the order of 100 warnings, and I think with
>> > some more work, this can be brought down to 10 (for the most annoying
>> > ones). If this happens, it should help us in treating warnings on
>> > latest clang/gcc more seriously than before. Among these two, I have
>> > been far more impressed with clang than gcc.
>> >
>> > This might stir the flames, but who knows: maybe in a year we can
>> > seriously consider -Werror for a certain set of "core platforms"
>> > (which can be voted upon; recall the leadership committee etc). By a
>> > "platform" I mean a complete environment: set of configure flags,
>> > compiler flags, compiler versions, etc.
>>
>> As someone who has done some distro packaging and occasionally tries to
>> get old packages compiling on newer systems, I just have a note to
>> this:
>>
>> Please never enable "-Werror" by default in a release version of a
>> package - where that's defined as whatever version you recommend
>> arbitrary users pick up.
>>
>> There's nothing worse than having some piece of software that's worked
>> for ages fail to compile just because the system you're building it on
>> now happens to produce an (often trivial) warning that wasn't seen on
>> the developer's system.
>
>
> I don't think anyone is suggesting adding -Werror to releases, it sounds
> like it's just for developer builds.

Indeed this is what I had in mind.

>
> As for the suggestion itself, the work itself is great (thanks Ganesh!),
> the suggestion of -Werror for developer builds on latest (whitelisted)
> clang/gcc releases sounds appealing.
>
> Ronald
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list