[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Add support for vp9 in iso-bmff

Ronald S. Bultje rsbultje at gmail.com
Mon Jun 13 20:53:56 CEST 2016


Hi guys,

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Yang Kongqun <yangkongqun at gmail.com> wrote:

> I am thinking of naming it as vpc instead, which aligns with avc.c and
> hevc.c. What do you think?
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Vignesh Venkatasubramanian <
> vigneshv-at-google.com at ffmpeg.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Ronald S. Bultje <rsbultje at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Kongqun Yang <yangkongqun at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Implemented according to the draft specification
> > > > "VP Codec ISO Media File Format Binding":
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> http://www.webmproject.org/vp9/#draft-vp-codec-iso-media-file-format-binding
> > > >
> > > > Change-Id: Iaa7ddf5524b17e8d79cd1923b26f096deeee6e91
> > > > ---
> > > >  libavformat/Makefile |   2 +-
> > > >  libavformat/isom.c   |   3 +
> > > >  libavformat/movenc.c |  15 +++++
> > > >  libavformat/vpx.c    | 170
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  libavformat/vpx.h    |  33 ++++++++++
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't particularly love the name "vpx.c" and "vpx.h", because they
> will
> > > make people think this is related to libvpx instead of just generic
> > > vp-something helpers. To prevent that, let's call it vpn.
> >
> > umm, vpn seems weird. how about 'vpcc' given that the functions in
> > this file are about writing out the vpcc atom?
>

vpc or vpcc is both fine with me, thanks.

Ronald


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list