[FFmpeg-devel] GP License question

Aaron Boxer boxerab at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 16:48:01 CET 2016


Guys!

As an act of goodwill, I just "closed" a j2k bug in trac.

https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/4653#comment:6

Turns out this was a bug in openjpeg :)


Kind Regards,
Aaron




On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <cehoyos at ag.or.at> wrote:

> Aaron Boxer <boxerab <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > > Aaron Boxer <boxerab <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > I am developing a jpeg 2000 codec licensed under Affero GPL.
> > >
> > > Why don't you work on fixing the remaining issues with
> > > FFmpeg's implementation instead?
> >
> > That would be OpenJPEG.
>
> (With the intention to distract from the fruitless
> license discussion: We will not accept AGPL contributions
> and we won't encourage you to start an AGPL fork.)
>
> No, FFmpeg contains a native Jpeg 2000 codec. I don't
> remember it being slow but it has missing features and
> it would be great if you worked on it. See trac (or the
> conformance samples) for examples for decoder problems,
> the encoder does not compress good enough.
>
> Carl Eugen
>
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list