[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: Add AVClass to AVCodecParameters
h.leppkes at gmail.com
Tue May 10 14:02:52 CEST 2016
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Michael Niedermayer
<michael at niedermayer.cc> wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:17:12AM +0100, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
>> On 5/10/2016 7:24 AM, Hendrik Leppkes wrote:
>> > I don't like this, the struct is pretty cleanly defined and unlikely
>> > to be extended much over time.
>> > Most other structs have AVOptions so the CLI can interact with it, but
>> > this struct is not meant to be modified by users, its just a direct
>> > line of communication between demuxer->decoder or encoder->muxer.
>> To me this mostly still feels like trying to make a demuxing library
>> something it isn't. It demuxes and muxes.
>> You can argue that it should be easier than decoding a frame to get this
>> info (which I don't personally think is much trouble at all). However,
>> jamming it into libavformat for reasons like "we've always done this" and
>> "there's no better place" is not good design IMO.
>> It sounds like what you really want is a higher level "easy" API. Don't
>> jam it in to existing decoupled APIs because it is convenient, IMO. That's
>> how horrible things like having ffmpeg.c functionality in libavformat came
>> to exist, and a decade of misery followed.
> This patch adds an AVClass field to AVCodecParameters like we use in
> other public structures.
> i fail to see how this patch is related to your reply
> What the patch does, is it makes the API more consistent and easy to
> use. Users call the AVOption functions to set fields in the main
> public structures, if they do that for AVCodecParameters it would
> Even an empty AVClass that doesnt list options would reduce that
> misery by at least not crashing but giving a clear error message.
We should not design our API around people not caring to read our API,
because thats not a fight we can ever win.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel