[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 0/2] RFC: Generic hwaccel for cuvid v2
philipl at overt.org
Sun Jun 25 16:59:35 EEST 2017
On Sat, 24 Jun 2017 21:42:23 -0400
"Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbultje at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Philip,
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Philip Langdale <philipl at overt.org>
> > Feedback on first proposal was lack of interest in having default
> > behaviour vary between hwaccels, despite their other differences.
> I think that's because many of us - including me - don't really
> understand this.
> I, for one, am totally happy to delegate this decision to you and
> trust you to come up with behaviour that improves the end used
> experience. Not out of disinterest, but out of ignorance.
I phrased that a bit wrong, I meant that the feedback stated a lack of
interest, rather than the lack of interest (ie: silence) being the
feedback. I know that this isn't an area that most people have opinions
There was some discussion on IRC as well, so I got more active feedback
than might at first appear.
More information about the ffmpeg-devel